If somebody has an accident or illness, we'll got you covered as a society.
But when somebody chooses this, by choice to abuse this system and do everyone harm, thats malice.
The infected, self-hating transsexual believes that it should be able to live in a modern home with a new roof, clean, heated, running water, functional electricity, and infinity food, clothing, and entertainment...
...all for free.
But of course, these things do not appear by themselves. They don't grow out of the ground. They are not delivered by santa. They are not free to the people who create them. They cost a huge amount of labor and risk!
So what the transsexual actually means is that everybody who makes those things should be its slave. Build my house! Clean my water! I should be able to lay around and look at furry porn all day while you work!
The transsexual has an underdeveloped brain, or perhaps an underexperienced brain, an uncultured brain. This is why it is not able to look out the window and see that every squirrel, bird, and worm is constantly struggling to feed and protect itself. This is nature's version of "earning a living."
The transsexual could do that. It could go outside and dig worms out of the dirt to eat. It could live in a hole under a tree. But it doesn't want to do that. It wants for other humans to get up in the morning and work a full day of labor to create all of the toys and treats that it needs to have a fun cozy life, all while it does absolutely nothing for absolutely no one.
It DESERVES.
Like a baby deserves milk.
"Waahhhh, feed me! Not because you agreed to or because you care about me, but because I will vote for the police to murder you if you don't!"
"I WANT MY FREE BOOBIE CARTOONS AND WEED VAPORIZERS! I VOTED FOR THEM! GIMME OR I'LL KILLL YOU! PAY FOR MEEEE"
People must more than ever understand that
Prosperity comes from wealth
Wealth is produced from land and capital
Land and capital are only worked through labour.
Working IS the only way to enjoy a happy lifestyle, and the sense of pointlessness encircling modern jobs is not because working is bad, but because the wealth being produced from work is going to the wrong people, the ((( international clique ))), the 1%, the central bank bondholders, who earn trillions from infinity debt created by governments borrowing from our Central Banks, the giant megafunds choking out the middle class and small to medium enterprise businesses.
Because the machinery to produce wealth - capital, and the loans and funding needed to maintain that machinery - credit, are increasingly centralised from 1914 onwards in the hands of a small rootless international clique. Because the crushing debt from government borrowing causes inflation, makes running businesses unfeasible, forces small banks who know small families and give them fair loans to shut down (young people don't even know this used to be a thing), and hence forces people to take out loans with larger distant predatory institutions interested in trapping them in debt and forcing them into bankruptcy. Because some businesses can't even get loans, and in desperation become publically traded to gain money, only to have their own companies taken away from them in hostile takeovers by ((( Wall Street hedge fund managers ))), who devour their assets and add them to BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard.
THAT is the problem, the OWNERSHIP and DISTRIBUTION of the capital and the wealth produced from Labour. It is NOT Labour which is the problem.
The transsexual gooner doesn't understand the above, they just seem to conflate the improper distribution of wealth with the futility of Labour, which is the exact same ideology as the current super rich globalist ((( white genocide loving ))) parasites who currently are stealing the fruits of their wealth!
>Raba Simeon: "Have you ever seen a wild animal or a bird practice a craft? And yet they nourish themselves without work. And yet they have only been created, I, however, have been created in order to serve my creator and / should be able to nourish myself without work. (Kidduschin F. 82a).
>Mr. Eleasar saw a field on which cabbage was planted on beds by width, and he spoke: “Even if one wanted to plant weeds by the length, commerce is better than you.” When Rab once walked between reeds and saw that they waved back and forth, he spoke: Just wave ever more, commerce is preferable to you.”
>Raba said: “Whoever uses 100 Sus for commerce can enjoy fish and wine every day; but whoever uses 100 Sus on the field, must put up with salt and hay....and is exposed to conflicts.” (Jebamoth F. 63 a).
- Babylonian Talmud
>A note of debt can be written in any language, as long as it is made in accordance to Jewish regulations and the witnesses are Jews and know how to read the text; but all promissory notes made under non-Jewish witnesses are invalid
-Choschem Hamischpat 86.1, Schulchan Aruch
Instead of fighting the demon, they imitate it! Labour suffocates! It is simply not directed in the right direction! Socialism, Distributism, a true free market without corporate bailouts, Decentralisation, any of these systems could fix the dreadful system we live under today, but a system that rejects labour is a system that is doomed to fail.
It's a lot in OP for me to read today, but this >>364358 make sense.
why are some countries authoritarian and some arent
I understand this is mostly about regime survival but still
16 messages omitted.
>During the 1848 revolutions, Friedrich Engels designated several Slavic and non-German groups in the Habsburg Empire as "counter-revolutionary". In his writings for the Neue Rheinische Zeitung, he categorized the Czechs, Slovaks, Croats, Serbs, Slovenes, and Ukrainians (Ruthenians) as "non-historic" peoples. He believed they inherently opposed progressive bourgeois revolutions and would inevitably perish in future historical developments.
P.S. lol notice how AI called Ruthenians - Ukrainians.
>Engels contrasted these groups with "historic" nations like the Germans, Poles, and Magyars, which he viewed as motors of historical progress. Because many of these smaller Slavic groups opposed the Hungarian and German nationalist movements and allied with the Habsburg monarchy to preserve their own autonomy, Engels viewed them as tools of absolutist counter-revolution.For a deeper dive into these specific 1848-1849 essays, you can read Engels's theoretical framework in texts like "The Magyar Struggle" and "Democratic Pan-Slavism" available via the Marxists Internet Archive.
So I think he didn't meant ethnicities but nations right? So not exactly racist.
And he was kinda right until yugo and ussr got cooked.
So many dumb comments from right wing Americans. Hello from the former East Germany. There is no comparison between the democratic socialists in the US and the regime of the former East Germany. It was the most authoritarian Stalinist dictatorship outside of Albania - the post-Stalin Soviets had to tell them to calm TF down multiple times because they were too harsh. Central planning, state ownership, collectivization... that's about all that it did that was classically communist. It was a brutal dictatorship, and like today's North Korea, had little to do with actual communism. Fascists with a red bandana for good show.
>AI called Ruthenians - Ukrainians.
You stuffed it into an LLM for summary?
>So I think he didn't meant ethnicities but nations right? So not exactly racist.
Define your version of racism.
Also should note Engels mentions the Scots and Basques as counter-revolutoinary. So he goes beyond the scope of the Austrian Empire when defining these.
>You stuffed it into an LLM for summary?
Just google'd it, thats google search ai.
>You stuffed it into an LLM for summary?
Well when you have a prejudice against certain race/ethnicity?
I think what Engels meant was addressed to a nation as a political/social/cultural construct not individual people. Dunno maybe that is still qualifies as racist.
3 citizens of Russia and Ukraine were bombed on the Monaco. An unknown individual left a backpack with explosives near the entrance of some building and ran away.
Allegedly, the target of the attack was the family of a Ukrainian scam call network.
Makes me wonder a bit on the hows and whys of this operation.
7 messages omitted.
This is what happens when you let schizophrenic Leftwing Lennonist idealism get in the way of the reality you don't want to accept. You can ignore reality for a short while, but it has a tendency of hitting you in the face.
3 messages omitted.
Amen >>363148
"You are satans children and you wish to carry out his will" - Jesus Christ
There is a 100% correlation with IQ and a people's ability to create a successful civilization.
Low IQ humans simply can't even if they live on a landmass that has widely available resources.
Thats why Israel is still a huge trash dump despite getting tens of billions of aid per year from White Christcucks.
What was social mobility like in European and maybe some other countries?
I didn't research it quite thoroughly yet, but in Russian Empire there was something called Table of Ranks. If a commoner spent enough time at the 14th rank and higher they could gain something called "personal nobility". This does not get passed down to your descendants. 8th rank and higher could grant you "hereditary nobility".
Here's an example of social mobility in Russian Empire. Lenin's father (born Ilya Ulyanin) was the son of a former serf based in Volga region. He received hereditary nobility in 1882 for his work as an educator. He started and managed a lot of schools for Volgan ethnic minorities and was likely some minority himself, but nobody is quite sure which one. Especially because this information was strongly suppressed by the Soviet leaders, as they feared this information could be used in adversarial propaganda.
24 messages omitted.
They did not assume that. That was the price to get the money.
Essentially it was like loaning. Land could not be pawned away or used as collateral. There were laws that forbid the alienation of the feudal land. But the noble had no money himself, only what the serfs gave or what he got from the sale of the produce from his lands and his serfs. So they give the right to collect the tax.
Just occurred to me that I might have missed what you really meant and my explanation is unnecessary.
the way you phrased it, it sounds as if it was (officially, if not sincerely) assumed that these tax gollectors would only collect the amount owed to the lord of the land and anything beyond that was corruption enabled by lack of supervision
>Since noone supervised them doing it, they could beat the money out of the serfs with profit.
I don't know how the arrangement was, but my impression is that their activities were frowned upon, not just by those who suffered by them but by Christian morals went against them. And those matters no matter how some wants to tell us that everyone was a hypocrite sinner just like us today. I do believe they at least had some expectation that they collect the amount that they could have collected themselves (which was regulated by laws).
But since people weren't saints either I think nobles and kings could see them as practical tools at best if they had pressing needs for funds. They looked away, and if things allowed they served justice.
Serving justice might not had been so straightforward. Because tax collectors could have powerful friends, other employers who needed their service.
Just like bankers who financed rival feudal lords, kings and emperors, and used them against each other so they can't get rid of bankers.
This is the type of info I love to hear.
The thing is, I often wonder if I would make it if I were born in a different period of time. Would it be possible for Bernd to rise up? Questions like that.
I also often think about the 90s a lot these were fucked up times in Russia but also times of opportunity as well.