>Musk leaves DOGE
>President Trump gives Musk a farewell honor
>Musk criticizes Trump's policies (One Big Beautiful Bill) on social media
>Musk denounces President Trump's involvement in the Epstein case on social media
>President Trump fires back by threatening to break contracts with SpaceX and Tesla in an interview
>Musk responds by saying SpaceX is the one who will break NASA's contracts on social media
>Musk retracts his previous comments on social media
That's all for now. The egomaquia began this Thursday.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3e5y4g5qxno
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/06/05/politics/donald-trump-elon-musk-ugliest-comments-analysis
Bernd
2025-06-14 07:50:16 ⋅ 15h
No. 343307
>>343186
Everyone is free to choose their path. In your case, you're allying yourself with dark lords like George Soros (promoter of immoral policies, market manipulator, election intervenor—a defender of democracy—and all this with the money he makes through speculation—financial capital). Even if you don't recognize it, he's your ideological ally because he promotes "progressive liberalism."
You could tell me, "But I have nothing to do with George Soros and his methods," but at the same time, you demand that conservatives answer for what Hitler did...
That's your side, and those are the lords who operate within it.
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/04/nonprofit-financed-by-billionaire-george-soros-donated-140-million-to-political-groups-in-2021.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Society_Foundations#Activities
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_projects_supported_by_George_Soros
>Is good because we are moving forward in the world, not back.
Given the current dynamics, if we're talking about social and economic development, the true progressives are the accelerationists who want to accelerate political and economic progress. Liberals are rather reactionary and anti-accelerationists (even for left-wing accelerationists).
That's why they're increasingly losing ground (in the US and Europe, not to mention in China and Russia, where they have no influence). This is also a danger for the old conservatives (Trump depends on Musk, a techno-libertarian). If anything, liberals are weakening (part of what's happening in L.A. is a reactionary attitude among liberals).
https://www.britannica.com/topic/accelerationism
>Accelerationists argue that technology, particularly computer technology, and capitalism, particularly the most aggressive, global variety, should be massively sped up and intensified – either because this is the best way forward for humanity, or because there is no alternative. Accelerationists favour automation. They favour the further merging of the digital and the human. They often favour the deregulation of business, and drastically scaled-back government. They believe that people should stop deluding themselves that economic and technological progress can be controlled. They often believe that social and political upheaval has a value in itself.
>Accelerationism, therefore, goes against conservatism, traditional socialism, social democracy, environmentalism, protectionism, populism, nationalism, localism and all the other ideologies that have sought to moderate or reverse the already hugely disruptive, seemingly runaway pace of change in the modern world. “Accelerationism is a political heresy,” write Robin Mackay and Armen Avanessian in their introduction to #Accelerate: The Accelerationist Reader, a sometimes baffling, sometimes exhilarating book, published in 2014, which remains the only proper guide to the movement in existence.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/11/accelerationism-how-a-fringe-philosophy-predicted-the-future-we-live-in
Vid related: >>343074
Bernd
2025-06-14 08:35:24 ⋅ 14h
No. 343308
>>343307
>George Soros
No shit Bernd, I hate all the mother fuggers in high power that are liberals. I still like them more than I like the conservatives, you seem conservative yourself, that’s fine Bernd free to choose their path.
>progressives are the accelerationists
Who I agree with, but also the social standards that the left give looking at MDCs much of there value are liberal, only recently are they switching.
>dark lords
If George Soros are considered a dark lord than what does that make choronzon?
Bernd
2025-06-14 08:55:19 ⋅ 14h
No. 343309
>>343308
>No shit Bernd, I hate all the mother fuggers in high power that are liberals. I still like them more than I like the conservatives, you seem conservative yourself, that’s fine Bernd free to choose their path
Okay. I don't like Hitler or his racism either. But embracing immorality under the guise of progress strikes me as an excuse to pass off motives as reasons.
>progressives are the accelerationists
Word games don't change reality as if they were a set of words. Just as repeating a thousand times that a woman doesn't turn a transvestite into anything other than a transvestite.
Acceleration brings with it a new individualism that has little to do with gender ideology and self-perception, nor with the "independent" model of women, the reactionary feminism represented by "feminists."
>If George Soros are considered a dark lord than what does that make choronzon?
Each side has its dark lords... >>342976
who said that democracy truly belonged to the voters? (There are those who believe that theories are reality and then get upset when things don't work out the way they were told.)
But in ancient and sacred Greece, lords of the masses already existed.
The question remains: Who are you with?
Bernd
2025-06-14 21:50:34 ⋅ 1h
No. 343322
>>343309
>I don’t like racism
**Why not?!?!?** I never said you did, you’re ok Bernd.
>Who are you with?
Center left, there is a lot I disagree with my fellow liberals (like the protest) but over all I see it as a step forward. If you mean Who am I with as in a political leader than no one I just vote for the less bad person.
>Each side has its dark lord's
Agreed, but my point was right winged politic’s lord is darker.
