Ich weiß nicht
Союз нерушимый республик свободных
Сплотила навеки Великая Русь.
Да здравствует созданный волей народов
Единый, могучий Советский Союз!
Славься, Отечество наше свободное,
Дружбы народов надёжный оплот!
Знамя советское, знамя народное
Пусть от победы к победе ведёт!
Сквозь грозы сияло нам солнце свободы,
И Ленин великий нам путь озарил:
Нас вырастил Сталин — на верность народу,
На труд и на подвиги нас вдохновил!
Славься, Отечество наше свободное,
Счастья народов надёжный оплот!
Знамя советское, знамя народное
Пусть от победы к победе ведёт!
Мы армию нашу растили в сраженьях.
Захватчиков подлых с дороги сметём!
Мы в битвах решаем судьбу поколений,
Мы к славе Отчизну свою поведём!
Славься, Отечество наше свободное,
Славы народов надёжный оплот!
Знамя советское, знамя народное
Пусть от победы к победе ведёт!
Does Bernd like labubu
7 messages omitted.
I would rather die
Hello, comrades. I would like to present my proposal:
We can look for ways to help the proletariat by understanding how the stock market works. Freelancing and entrepreneurship are also alternative ways to make the revolution because they dissolve the hierarchical relationship between capital and labor (the owner is also the worker. It is the closest thing to the figure of "free producers" in today's material reality). Another way to protect the proletariat from the consumer society is by exploring expense control (which neoliberals idealistically understand as financial minimalism, which they unfortunately fill with marketing garbage).
We can also study the relationship between Chinese communism and American neoliberalism by studying the development of projects like DeepSeek and iShare China in relation to the neoliberal NASDAQ. Or through the emergence of cryptocurrencies and their evolution.
This board could serve as a way to cultivate the "way of Jude," which is a form of post-Marxism that some of us practice.
>It's a type of operation that makes small demands on one's time, and it's worthwhile running some risk in order to relieve the enemy of his money.
Karl Marx
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-01-31/karl-marx-also-liked-to-bet-against-the-stock-market/13106214
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion_Philips#Karl_Marx
https://read.dukeupress.edu/hope/article-abstract/49/2/207/12786/Capitalist-Threads-Engels-the-Businessman-and-Marx?redirectedFrom=fulltext
https://www.dw.com/en/tourists-snap-up-zero-euro-bills-with-karl-marxs-image/a-45089015
>I always saw more potential on /STALIN/
Yes. I was searching for /economy/. And then this site came up, and it hit me.
We need to study how the media works and its relationship with work. Also, the speculative market, which is like a fetish of market idols where people pay for an asset that has no real function. How does the greater fool theory actually work? When is the time to buy and when to sell? What gives it its value? How do we know when an asset has fundamentals? Is it necessary for it to have them to have value?
And many more questions.
Also, the logic of the labor market (What leads recruiters to choose one candidate over another? Track record or connections? Technical or cross-functional skills?) and entrepreneurship (How do companies compete? Is it necessary to have financial capital and connections to undertake a business, or is there mobility?).
We shouldn't read the theory of capital as if it were a finished thought. Instead, we should rethink its essence. How does capital work today?
I will probably make a separate reply giving my thoughts on the questions but for now:
>study how the media works and its relationship with work.
Agreed, the contagious diffusion of the contemporary world greatly impacts the social environment.
>How does capital work today?
I found this article about capital and stocks, I love arxiv.org I highly recommend it.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.01239
Nine the stocks are crashing, but you know what’s going up?
4 messages omitted.
>chronic crises
When I was a kid I would ask my mom why we didn’t own stocks, her main reason was it was unethical. I honestly agree, I don’t want to support the outsourcing, offshoring, and modern day slavery practices by big corporations.
>economic recession
In America at least, I almost to get trump’s plan of putting the factories back into America. Overall if pulled off then people will be having better working conditions and pay. But that is if he can pull it off, which is providing a challenge.
>In America at least, I almost to get trump’s plan of putting the factories back into America. Overall if pulled off then people will be having better working conditions and pay. But that is if he can pull it off, which is providing a challenge.
Oh, yes! That's going to be good in particular terms because by "importing" capital back, there will be jobs for people (where there are means of production, there is an active workforce). It won't be good for the rest of the world because if a factory opens in the US, it will then close somewhere else (probably China. Which would explain why China doesn't take it well—in addition to the tariffs, which are part of Trump's strategy to reclaim domestic capital).
But in general terms, I don't think it will work. From what I've been reading, the US has been deindustrialized for 40 years; it can't recover from that in a couple of five-year periods. Meanwhile, powers like China and India, and some countries in the Middle East and Latin America (Brazil and Mexico) are emerging. But anyway, I don't think ordinary people who manage to get a job thanks to a local factory will care about that (it's similar to when a foreign company opens in Latin America, only this would be the reverse).
I believe this plan is a desperate strategy and unrealistic for reindustrializing the US economy. But it may have an opportunity in new technologies.
>Yet certain statistics also lend a superficial plausibility to claims of domestic manufacturing’s dire state. U.S. manufacturing employment peaked in 1979 at 19.5 million employees, stood at just over 17 million in 2000, and has since dropped to approximately 13 million as of January 2023. In relative terms, the percentage of workers employed in manufacturing has more than halved since 1980 as did its share of gross domestic product (GDP) from 1978 to 2018.
>Such declines also correlate with a growing embrace of trade liberalization over this period via such initiatives as the North American Free Trade Agreement, conclusion of the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations and agreement to establish the World Trade Organization (WTO), and China’s accession to the WTO (although the decline was already underway when each of these took place).
>Regardless of how one defines manufacturing, the United States is clearly one of its heavy hitters. In 2021, it ranked second in the share of global manufacturing output at 15.92 percent—greater than Japan, Germany, and South Korea combined—and the sector by itself would constitute the world’s eighth-largest economy. The United States was the world’s fourth-largest steel producer in 2020, second-largest automaker in 2021, and largest aerospace exporter in 2021.
https://www.cato.org/publications/reality-american-deindustrialization#deindustrialization-worries-are-nothing-new
>When I was a kid I would ask my mom why we didn’t own stocks, her main reason was it was unethical. I honestly agree, I don’t want to support the outsourcing, offshoring, and modern day slavery practices by big corporations.
Oh no! It can actually be a weapon of emancipation. We must learn how the speculative market and trade in general work. >>344676
>has been deindustrialized for 40 years; it can't recover from that in a couple of five-year periods.
The lack of cooperation of other countries and this fact are his biggest blunders.
>I believe this plan is a desperate strategy and unrealistic for reindustrializing the US economy
Economist agree, the plan is most likely going to fail.
How do you feel about the Soviet Union and its system? What was good about her and what wasn't?
Pulling more PPL out of poverty han anyone that Century rocked. Pioneering space exploración, descolonización, universal healthcare and socialism was cool. Bad things about It were the lack of support for their own computing research initiatives, the failure Tó balance out a healty democrátic centralism with a plurality of parties and private capital with statecraft.
China has all of that Sorted out PLUS an económy that is actual a threat to the natonazis.
Hopefully one day the USSR will come back and this lame ass shit globalist capitalism period nightmare will be over.
This fat cunt is not playing any 4D chess shit he just want to force a recession so their 8 quintichillions dollar debt will be more easy to pay, he is literally playing and fucking the economy, if you live in america (continent) your grandsons capital will be two potatoes and a box of juice because of this zionist blonde retard.
14 messages omitted.
Who are you, the "leftist" Sjw? or an altrite? It's just that I've only heard about all kinds of people in America. 🍟 🍟The Palestinians or the right-wing Nazis. I agree, Trump is proud, but Musk takes on a lot of responsibilities. I am also against the war in the Gaza Strip and for peace there in the format of the 1967 borders or even further.
(I'm not a leftypol user, but did went there once just for the flags)
(I'm a pol user but I go there for the lulz and shits and giggles)
So yeah just to start off with that, but I feel like you people would shit on it
1 message omitted.
Yes. From 8kanker they always had sour grapes about /pol/ controlling the spotlight but I think some of them are okay.
I've browsed their board a bit, there's some decent content on it. Mods are very ban happy. Their memetics are very shallow and lend their ideas to mirroring a lot of ideas /pol/ created through idiocy or pure shenanigans, but their idea of fun involves an abundance of words and generally over constructed ideas.
I met a tranng irl that thought everything should be filed through a marxist lens. It really bothered me. We're defiling ideas to inspire zero new creations, only stagnated old world thought to apply to modern problems because lolmarxsaidso.
/leftypol/ imo was
I've been on 8chan /pol/ in september 2014 (yes even before the full goobergate ban on 4chan) and it was a surprisingly balanced group of fringes – lolberts, dork enlightenment, stormfags, and eventual /leftypol/ were pretty balanced. Were it not for that month, I would probably never have taken up posting on 8chan, and the insufferable avatar known as "slovborg" that developed on 8chan's /int/ board would not exist today. I would merely be another lurker that occasionally effortpoasts.
Dork enlightenment got bullied off by low effort shitposting, and /leftypol/ surrendered and decided they want to have a safespace where their views can't be challenged.
This was the turning point that cemented the political fate of 8/pol/. December mod selection which turned everything into a railroaded astroturf was just the final nail in the coffin.
This is why I have a strongly negative opinion of /leftypol/. Their surrender and retreat into a safespace spelled the downfall of 8chan (and myself).
