Lite mode. Switch to Full
invert_colors
logout
/sci/
Post a Threadarrow_downward
TexasThe social science of Bernd psychologyBernd2026-07-08 19:15:46 · 4mnNo. 362849reply
Ehh sci tier enough,
 
I want to make this thread to possibly save ripchan form extinction and increase the number of VERY high quality post. I think our image board is a good combination of both shit posting and serious discussions. However, as Plato states the world is made of ideal forms, by understanding these forms we can improve our own reality. The goal is not necessarily to spam and reply farm, the goal is to consistently create maximum quality threads to were anytime you log on you are a better person then when you came, this should be the goal for any online discussion, as the social network should bring people together instead of making them more separate.
 
There is a theoretical thread that could auto säge 3 many time over, and there is a Hypothetical thread that could shoot KC like a rocket. It is ip to us to discover what these threads are and how to replicate them.
 
STARTING QUESTIONS
Is it better to use an actual photo or a digital drawing as a caption? A gif or a video? A title or no title? How many files should be used 1-4?
 
Should the thread’s word length be long with lots of things to respond to or short as to not deter people from posting? Is it better to speak telegraphically so people have a tersely understanding of what to say? Or should we post with many tangents, as to increase the number of conversations.
 
hypothesis and theories In the replies
 
There is so much to say so I will post them in the comments. I encourage you to respond with your own theories, thoughts and opinions, as well as correct me or add one to what could be said. I hope you enjoy another meta discussion and psychological thread.
 
TEST
 
The funniest part of science is the testing to see if your theories are correct. Of course, our sample size is much too small, I recommend testing threads on kohlchan.net krautchan.org/int/ or krautchan.org/m there you will get much insight on the Bernd mind to help this KC.
2 messages omitted.
TexasThe pseudo quality threadBernd2026-07-08 19:19:38 · 4mnNo. 362852reply
generals are a good way for every user to stay on track and get a shit ton of replies. We can prove this with the most replied to thread of modern KC, the Russia vs Ukrainian kohl general. While the subject matter is /pol/ tier there have been thousands of threads that had stayed on track with the theme and persisted throughout time for a while. However such threads are prone to corruption and in the worse cases make it impossible for anything new (the highest form of human creation) to be made.
Take for example ernstchan.top, it was boring in large part to the fact that it was an image board filled with generals anyone who wanted to make something new was pushed to the bottom and made room to the threads that had over 200 replies but on an image board slower than this one.
 
KC.org is that standard for generals, using them as containment thread instead of containing the users. Orgchan knows that while they may synthesize quality discussions they in themselves are not quality.
TexasHuman response to provocative materialBernd2026-07-08 19:25:21 · 4mnNo. 362854reply
The reason why kohlchan threads suck is because everyone is trying to stay on page one, and the demographic of kohlchan is white older men. This is why porn and shock videos are posted all the time, and why they are so rude, they want attention and they want people to reply and click on there thread.
MoscowBernd2026-07-09 01:24:25 · 4mnNo. 362866reply
>Should the thread’s word length be long with lots of things to respond to or short as to not deter people from posting? Is it better to speak telegraphically so people have a tersely understanding of what to say? Or should we post with many tangents, as to increase the number of conversations.
Honestly I've been spending too much time on the Internet posting my attempts at technical writing.
I enjoy it but it takes away from me, so I'll have to cut on how much I read and process. I am not the only one like this.
 
I think it's best to make a strong summary in the beginning or a good structure so people can know what you're talking about by skimming. I know I don't really do that all the time, but that's cause I mostly write stuff down as a reference for myself.
 
>increase the number of VERY high quality post
Personally I think .rip could do well as an idea/info exchange platform or informational blogposting. I really like that old thread about China and Western propaganda for instance. This was the inspiration for my generals. In an ideal world I'd attract people who like to research, explore, and share information.
TexasBernd2026-07-09 02:49:31 · 4mnNo. 362868reply
>Honestly I've been spending too much time on the Internet posting my attempts at technical writing.
I enjoy it but it takes away from me
 
Most of your post have better quality then maybe 69% of org threads, 87% of all KC threads, your posts help KC.rip a lot. However sometimes I struggle with what to say or if I’m even qualified to say everything at all.
 
>Personally I think .rip could do well as an idea/info exchange platform
This, but I don’t want KC to look like kohlchan and just become a news channel. The best threads are the silly ones that leave you happy. I like obscure topics and information, they make for really fun threads.

MoscowShare what you've learned recentlyBernd2026-06-28 18:43:31 · 4mnNo. 362281reply
I like watching pop science videos, reading scientific books, and I want to share my summaries of them here. Of course everyone else is welcome to share any sort of fun fact or idea that they don't think needs a separate thread.
 
I have already written some, I'll crosspost them here.
4 messages omitted.
CanadaBernd2026-06-29 22:20:26 · 4mnNo. 362353reply
Does How to commit more warcrimes count?
United StatesBernd2026-06-29 23:36:06 · 4mnNo. 362355reply
I recently learned that science actually doesn't know what gravity is, doesn't know what an atom looks like, doesn't know what light is, doesn't know the origin of the Universe and to top it all off, we now think that time doesn't even exist.
United StatesBernd2026-06-30 19:34:31 · 4mnNo. 362398reply
Humans Just make words up for said stuff,etc.
CaliforniaBernd2026-06-30 19:47:49 · 4mnNo. 362408reply
Yup,welcome to the club.

CanadaBernd2025-12-31 18:58:48 · 10mnNo. 353174reply
Conspiracy to murder hospital patients by hospital staff.Thousands of hospital patients are murdered by hospital staff.Poison drug pills,excess drug injections,lethal drug injections,depriving of oxygen,asphyxiation,injecting heart stopping drugs,poisoned food and drinks,poison in IV bags,witholding life saving treatment.Their evil plans.People saying and screaming call 911 are parts of the conspiracy.People driving people to hospital and callers to 911 to get the ambulance paramedics to come and get and drive the person to hospital are parts of the conspiracy.When staying in hospital the patients are killed by hospital staff.The hospital then lies and says the patients died because of their illness.Hospitals and hospices are places to kill seniors and people.
6 messages omitted.
United KingdomBernd2026-06-26 17:04:08 · 4mnNo. 362156reply
Evil
United StatesBernd2026-06-26 17:20:38 · 4mnNo. 362169reply
Maybe that's where some of the beef in McDonalds is coming from? Jk....I hope. Cannibalism is yuck,long pork is what some call human meat,tastes kinda like chicken i heard but still yuck. Also,organ harvesting possibly?
CroatiaBernd2026-06-26 20:11:31 · 4mnNo. 362189reply
Its called Munchausen By Proxy. Its a psychiatric condition where a person has a morbid fascination with Medicine and Health Care in general, tends to lionize doctors and nurses, and is attention-seeking. The person wants to be a "hero" and will injure or harm a patient or relative and then take steps to save them just in time or notify staff.
Other times they outright kill a patient by believing their were "ending their suffering".
 
They should be simply called serial killers and should be dealt with in the same way as other serial killers. They cannot be reformed because it is a severe mental health condition.
UkraineBernd2026-06-26 21:20:27 · 4mnNo. 362203reply
666

TexasVOID LOREBernd2026-06-25 04:49:04 · 4mnNo. 362093reply
Did you know that there are places in the universe with VERY little star activity? I knew, but only recently did I realize how strange that actually is.
10 messages omitted.
United KingdomBernd2026-06-26 17:11:44 · 4mnNo. 362163reply
Pov:We know more about space then our own Oceans on Earth. 😉
HungaryBernd2026-06-26 17:13:54 · 4mnNo. 362165reply
To be honest most of space has no star activity.
United StatesBernd2026-06-26 17:19:33 · 4mnNo. 362168reply
Agreed 🤝
CroatiaBernd2026-06-26 20:16:18 · 4mnNo. 362190reply
The sheer size of space means its impossible to have Star Wars or to have patrolled Territories.
It makes for good entertainment though.

TexasAbusing notationBernd2026-05-31 22:27:35 · 5mnNo. 360463reply
About a month ago I was talking with my friend about Tachyons being imaginary mass when I thought about the idea of quaternionic mass, that lead me to like minded individuals exploring this idea as well. [I was too excited to explore too much] however By why stop there, no one is talking about octernionic mass or further.
 
So I encourage you to break normal boundaries and start applying things to other things to see if they can fit.
4 messages omitted.
TexasBernd2026-06-04 05:35:55 · 5mnNo. 360836reply
>https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.13239
 
>https://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0305024
 
>https://www.researchgate.net/profile/A-Arbab/publication/358260345_Quantum_mechanics_with_quaternionic_mass/links/62d032abb549174c84a38da6/Quantum-mechanics-with-quaternionic-mass.pdf?origin=publication_detail&_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIiwicGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uRG93bmxvYWQiLCJwcmV2aW91c1BhZ2UiOiJwdWJsaWNhdGlvbiJ9fQ
 
There are no good videos on such a subject.
United StatesBernd2026-06-04 07:02:49 · 5mnNo. 360837reply
Oh boy.
Would you make one? or an article?
I do also sometimes encounter things that are not spoken of. I think it's good to elaborate on them at least somewhere.
TexasBernd2026-06-05 03:42:24 · 5mnNo. 360856reply
Perhaps one day I could make a chemiball comic or something to inform my audience.
QuebecBernd2026-06-06 13:45:05 · 5mnNo. 360914reply
Very Doubtful.

TexasAntiverseBernd2026-05-23 04:22:56 · 5mnNo. 360155reply
>for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction
Dose Bernd believe in the antiverse?
8 messages omitted.
United StatesBernd2026-05-24 01:13:45 · 5mnNo. 360182reply
Meh
HungaryBernd2026-05-24 09:50:17 · 5mnNo. 360185reply
Now I'm thinking an antiverse is when they write a verse without rhythm and rhymes.
United StatesBernd2026-05-24 14:06:37 · 5mnNo. 360186reply
CanadaBernd2026-05-27 03:46:14 · 5mnNo. 360290reply
Yesh

Texasis the electron a photon with toroidal topology?Bernd2025-11-26 04:00:55 · 11mnNo. 351322reply
This will be like the MOND thread were I say no because I don’t like to challenge scientific beliefs.
 
Before I “debunk” this claim and actually do research I want to make a prediction: of course not, the symmetries are completely different, they aren’t even the same classification of particles
 
I might be surprised however my journey starts now, come back with Bernds in a day.
 
Sources
https://fondationlouisdebroglie.org/AFLB-222/MARK.TEX2.pdf
 
https://quicycle.com/
 
7 messages omitted.
KuwaitBernd2025-11-30 23:01:44 · 11mnNo. 351452reply
Nice
SwedenBernd2025-12-02 19:30:37 · 11mnNo. 351490reply
what's your credentials son do you have a big fancy degree?
TexasBernd2025-12-02 23:06:02 · 11mnNo. 351496reply
>do you have a big fancy degree?
No, I just like chemiball.
TexasKryptonBernd2026-03-17 22:02:10 · 7mnNo. 357200reply
https://c3d.libretexts.org/CalcPlot3D/index.html?type=parametric;parametric=2;x=0.137sin(v)*cos(u);y=0.137sin(v)*sin(u);z=0.137cos(v);visible=true;umin=0;umax=2pi;usteps=30;vmin=0;vmax=pi;vsteps=30;alpha=180;format=normal;constcol=rgb(255,0,0)&type=parametric;parametric=2;x=0.32sin(v)*cos(u);y=0.32sin(v)*sin(u);z=0.32cos(v);visible=true;umin=0;umax=2pi;usteps=12;vmin=0;vmax=pi;vsteps=12;alpha=15;format=reversed;constcol=rgb(255,0,0)&type=parametric;parametric=2;x=0.08sin(v)*cos(u)+0.24cos(1.667pi);y=0.08sin(v)*sin(u)+0.24sin(1.667pi);z=0.08cos(v)+0.1;visible=true;umin=0;umax=2pi;usteps=30;vmin=0;vmax=pi;vsteps=30;alpha=180;format=reversed;constcol=rgb(255,0,0)&type=parametric;parametric=2;x=0.08sin(v)*cos(u)+0.24cos(pi);y=0.08sin(v)*sin(u)+0.24sin(pi);z=0.08cos(v)+0.1;visible=true;umin=0;umax=2pi;usteps=30;vmin=0;vmax=pi;vsteps=30;alpha=180;format=reversed;constcol=rgb(255,0,0)&type=parametric;parametric=2;x=0.08sin(v)*cos(u)+0.24cos(0.333pi);y=0.08sin(v)*sin(u)+0.24sin(0.333pi);z=0.08cos(v)+0.1;visible=true;umin=0;umax=2pi;usteps=30;vmin=0;vmax=pi;vsteps=30;alpha=180;format=reversed;constcol=rgb(255,0,0)&type=parametric;parametric=2;x=0.08sin(v)*cos(u);y=0.08sin(v)*sin(u);z=0.08cos(v)-0.25;visible=true;umin=0;umax=2pi;usteps=30;vmin=0;vmax=PI;vsteps=30;alpha=180;format=reversed;constcol=rgb(255,0,0)&type=parametric;parametric=2;x=0.02sin(v)*cos(u);y=0.02sin(v)*sin(u);z=0.02cos(v);visible=true;umin=0;umax=2pi;usteps=20;vmin=0;vmax=pi;vsteps=20;alpha=-1;format=normal;constcol=rgb(255,0,0)&type=parametric;parametric=2;x=0.7sin(v)*cos(u);y=0.7sin(v)*sin(u);z=0.7cos(v);visible=true;umin=0;umax=2pi;usteps=20;vmin=0;vmax=pi;vsteps=20;alpha=65;format=normal;constcol=rgb(255,0,0)&type=parametric;parametric=2;x=0.15sin(v)*cos(u)+0.48cos(0pi);y=0.15sin(v)*sin(u)+0.48sin(0pi);z=0.15cos(v)+0.33;visible=true;umin=0;umax=2pi;usteps=30;vmin=0;vmax=pi;vsteps=30;alpha=200;format=normal;constcol=rgb(255,0,0)&type=parametric;parametric=2;x=0.15sin(v)*cos(u)+0.48cos(0.5pi);y=0.15sin(v)*sin(u)+0.48sin(0.5pi);z=0.15cos(v)+0.33;visible=true;umin=0;umax=2pi;usteps=30;vmin=0;vmax=pi;vsteps=30;alpha=220;format=normal;constcol=rgb(255,0,0)&type=parametric;parametric=2;x=0.15sin(v)*cos(u)+0.48cos(1pi);y=0.15sin(v)*sin(u)+0.48sin(1pi);z=0.15cos(v)+0.33;visible=true;umin=0;umax=2pi;usteps=30;vmin=0;vmax=pi;vsteps=30;alpha=200;format=normal;constcol=rgb(255,0,0)&type=parametric;parametric=2;x=0.15sin(v)*cos(u)+0.48cos(0.75pi);y=0.15sin(v)*sin(u)+0.48sin(0.75pi);z=0.15cos(v)-0.33;visible=true;umin=0;umax=2pi;usteps=30;vmin=0;vmax=pi;vsteps=30;alpha=200;format=normal;constcol=rgb(255,0,0)&type=parametric;parametric=2;x=0.98sin(v)*cos(u);y=0.98sin(v)*sin(u);z=0.98cos(v);visible=true;umin=0;umax=2pi;usteps=16;vmin=0;vmax=pi;vsteps=12;alpha=75;format=wireframe;constcol=rgb(255,0,0)&type=parametric;parametric=2;x=0.15sin(v)*cos(u)+0.48cos(1.25pi);y=0.15sin(v)*sin(u)+0.48sin(1.25pi);z=0.15cos(v)-0.33;visible=true;umin=0;umax=2pi;usteps=30;vmin=0;vmax=pi;vsteps=30;alpha=200;format=normal;constcol=rgb(255,0,0)&type=parametric;parametric=2;x=0.15sin(v)*cos(u)+0.48cos(1.5pi);y=0.15sin(v)*sin(u)+0.48sin(1.5pi);z=0.15cos(v)+0.33;visible=true;umin=0;umax=2pi;usteps=30;vmin=0;vmax=pi;vsteps=30;alpha=200;format=normal;constcol=rgb(255,0,0)&type=parametric;parametric=2;x=0.15sin(v)*cos(u)+0.48cos(1.75pi);y=0.15sin(v)*sin(u)+0.48sin(1.75pi);z=0.15cos(v)-0.33;visible=true;umin=0;umax=2pi;usteps=30;vmin=0;vmax=pi;vsteps=30;alpha=200;format=normal;constcol=rgb(255,0,0)&type=parametric;parametric=2;x=0.15sin(v)*cos(u)+0.48cos(0.25pi);y=0.15sin(v)*sin(u)+0.48sin(0.25pi);z=0.15cos(v)-0.33;visible=true;umin=0;umax=2pi;usteps=30;vmin=0;vmax=pi;vsteps=30;alpha=200;format=normal;constcol=rgb(255,0,0)&type=parametric;parametric=2;x=0.14sin(v)*cos(u)+0.82cos(0pi);y=0.14sin(v)*sin(u)+0.82sin(0pi);z=0.14cos(v)-0.2;visible=true;umin=0;umax=2pi;usteps=30;vmin=0;vmax=pi;vsteps=30;alpha=200;format=reversed;constcol=rgb(255,0,0)&type=parametric;parametric=2;x=0.14sin(v)*cos(u)+0.82cos(0.667pi);y=0.14sin(v)*sin(u)+0.82sin(0.667pi);z=0.14cos(v)-0.2;visible=true;umin=0;umax=2pi;usteps=30;vm

TexasBernd2026-03-17 00:52:05 · 7mnNo. 357167reply
This is the dumbest shit I’ve seen all day

TexasBernd2026-03-16 19:49:05 · 7mnNo. 357166reply
Space is big, every dot you see in the photo is a galaxy, incomprehensibly big. In between millions of kilometers of hydrogen atoms every centimeter.

FinlandBernd2025-05-22 04:52:17 · 1yNo. 341558reply
The nudibranch is a truly outstanding animal
1 message omitted.
TexasBernd2025-05-23 13:56:12 · 1yNo. 341640reply
Bernds who like the ocean use
https://oceanhero.today/
FinlandBernd2025-05-23 15:31:08 · 1yNo. 341645reply
intressang concept
TexasBernd2025-05-23 16:07:56 · 1yNo. 341647reply
Good web browser, has krautchan.rip over krautchan.org in listings.
TexasBernd2026-02-18 05:54:52 · 8mnNo. 356414reply
I’m surprised by how big the prehistoric ones were.

Texasmath simulatorsBernd2025-11-26 20:55:18 · 11mnNo. 351336reply
Post math simulators
 
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/sl4ucvcaca
 
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/um2wwsev11
 
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/e9ti5bi2lr
 
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/eob3uhfplp
2 messages omitted.
SwedenBernd2025-11-30 21:42:41 · 11mnNo. 351444reply
don't you be sneaking too much on that Texas smoked brisked right now before your siblings get a go at it, isn't it not
TexasquaternionsBernd2025-12-05 23:12:58 · 11mnNo. 351675reply
Ok
https://eater.net/quaternions
TexasBernd2025-12-21 01:04:01 · 10mnNo. 352546reply
https://evolvecode.io/hyperspace/index.html
 
And
 
https://www.geogebra.org/m/twfwsxb9
United StatesAtomsBernd2026-02-16 16:32:59 · 8mnNo. 356389reply
https://www.kavang.com/atom

SwedenBernd2026-01-09 20:48:15 · 10mnNo. 354107reply
Does ChatGPT pass the Turing test?
12 messages omitted.
GermanyBernd2026-01-21 16:25:55 · 9mnNo. 354888reply
the problem at the core is language isn't math.
math is a language, yes, but human language doesn't convert to pure math without mistakes.
 
another point is:
our current model is at it's theoretical maximum performance, when it hits the average/median of the training data; not better.
 
if you filter the training data heavily, you do not have a wide range of possible topics.
if you do not filter the training data, you have shit tier responses, because the average human is shit tier.
HungaryBernd2026-01-21 19:39:27 · 9mnNo. 354905reply
I think what "hallucination" means (at least from what I read) that when there is no data in the training set in it's "memory" then it comes up with something that likely exists irl.
The example is that it was referring to a package on github that didn't exist and listed as a dependency for some application (I think it was some aliexpress api stuff), but the name of the package he composed from relevant snippets, and it sounded likely such thing exist.
Thing is, these LLMs, chatbots, autocompletes, aren't occupied by giving an answer or checking facts, but by generating a text that sounds human, sounds believable.
ArgentinaNETBernd2026-01-21 23:08:07 · 9mnNo. 354911reply
>math is a language, yes, but human language doesn't convert to pure math without mistakes.
hmmm...I kinda agree, but because Math is perfect, not because language isn't. But math is just...Different kind of "perfect", it's almost divine and it replicates in the universe or quarks. "As above, so below", "Your kingdom come, your will be done".
 
>Theoretical maximum performance
I kind of understand what you say? there is no more room to improve AI with the CURRENT models, that's half true, we can still use this "AI Language" but do bigger datacenters, you will not have a ferrari but your car will be faster.
 
>aren't occupied by giving an answer or checking facts
 
it's relative because it depends on what outcome you want it to be. If I learn about programming and ask chatgpt "hey give me this code, hey this is a mistake, fix it, hey there is another mistake" he will just give you the code and generic text. But if you TALK to the AI and ask why something happen, it can actually teach you why something is like it is, and how can you do that.
 
Again, only with coding and programming, I didn't test it with anything else, but it's really good to teach how to develop your skills on coding.
QuebecBernd2026-01-22 03:07:45 · 9mnNo. 354924reply
Welcome to the Dystopia. The internet is censored all to heck nowadays.

TexasErdős problemsBernd2026-01-18 13:28:23 · 9mnNo. 354711reply
Erdős problems are problem in mathematics that are easy to explain but difficult to prove.
 
>https://www.erdosproblems.com/

PolandJak tam Kierownik PyndzelBernd2026-01-15 05:59:47 · 9mnNo. 354444reply
W obdyp ?
arrow_upward