but what really makes me ask question is why is thatthis country i so incerdibly poor

i feel major reason is lack of consumerist product. unlike in japan or america, there is not enough money going into movies. of course this isnt eniretly, true as around 3000 children are born MONTHLY and the country's population is literally dying only to be replaced by migrants. And more older native russians means more welfare that has to be paid (besides being EXTREMELY LOW). But there is greater reason, I think there is lack of consumerist product beside the church milking money off. A movie from US or Japan will make money from everyone in China, France, Brazil, Australia, South Africa as long as it sticks to the idea that all races are equal and that superheroes are real and have nothing to do with consumerist ploy to make income from poorer people. But if russians made a movie itd be banned in half of these countries and only from china you can get some realistic income which doesnt matter since china accepts every international movie (as long as it doesnt joke about CCP or have blacks.) The reason why arabs are so incredibly poor despite manual labor, is because they don't make nearly as much money as if they made Avengers. Of course, I am white so I might be in movie industry or something. But when you really think about it, that means more arabs less median income. By default because there will be less entertainment, since religious people don't really create this stuff (unless for their own with religious preceipits and the mood) so its not far off that at some point russia pakistan india and usa become equal. however, it will only be the economic crisis of consumerism that you used to attract sandnigs for better pay. Because they don't realize that your country is rich because of the amount of external money influating from consumerist jobs in society. That means that its very likely the money will stop flowing into average jobs, eventually creating hyper rich community followed by lesser rich community who try to both exploit the globalist strategy that has doomed us to this ragnarok.

the difference is whether you want to be rich or to have a family and the people you love you. Of course, if its the first you will have difficulties in certain aspects. that's why white people have probelms with family making. they are so alone. like the guy who developed minecraft or gook who drew manga all his life. they are lonely. they spend all the time making profit while sandniggers have real family and people in their back. I can relate. But only slightly I understand how advantageous it is for them.

 

They are poor overall but not all whites will be rich snobs or whatever. Look at Poland. This country is self-sustainable, the rest are absolute shitter that will go to destruction. Of course, Poland probably suffers from aristocratic doramnt syndrom that lasts a few decades before "the great replacement" syndrome and "its okay to be white" syndrome. But the laborers in this country are white. All of them are white. They have to make the inner country more intense for higher survival, then look at South Korea. They are superracist and torture their teens but end up becoming more succesfl despise being small country. same with hong kong. these countries can succeed by putting econodomic innter pressure over external. Privatization that was practiced in WW1 and resulted in Great Depression afterwords.

 

Of course, the privatization is practiced only by few countries in our world. But even then, Russia outsources everything to migrants. Unlike Poland which doesn't outsource anything causing external pressure, being poorer slightly than western Europe but the advantage is stability relatively. America relied on goods from other european countries and economic partnerships, wealth etc because these countries were privatized against each other but not against America. But because of that all of the competition together outbeat America and after the war there was no longer support and America went to chaos, similar to how now America would also die without external support on Marvel and India. It might feel overexaggerating but it isn't though.

 

sharty added captcha and 4cuck i wont go there, so i post here i know eventually a large amount of people will see this over time.

I am getting tired of expressing it in text sorry for that.

also sanction question

 

when you think about other countries who werent sanctioned they are not doing that better. sure they are allowed to have products and they will be made relatively cheaper for them at the cost of the company salaries. But there is going to be stealing and ukranains, serbians, romanians or any other country will steal shit behind the back. When we look at the picture, can we say crap like its because Italy is just an accident? I think it'd be safer to say that Russia and Italy are not different but same issue. Without sanctions, the guys at pentagon and federal reserrve will still be the top dogs everyone else will be lower than them. No matter how hard Noth Macedonia may try to economically forge itself, it will never be any richer in median profit. The only way to fix it is for the balkans to completely leave the EU and create their own coalition, but whatever. They will always be second class countries, it doesn't matter how they develop because overall even as migrants they will be used to make profit for first class citizens like British, Americans and etc. However, they don't even know how much they truly rely on you guys. if all of you stopped your ties with western europe, nvm. I guess the Avengers at cinema is more important.

 

The moment they start making more money off your population and brainwash it, it's over. your country will be eternal underdog to be used for cheap labor.

it sounds weird to tihnk that africa and middle east bring any income whatsoever to westenr media, but they really do give money. they make huge profit, the problem is poverty question.

 

if there is a guy and he has 2 friends.

and together they make shop sneed's feed & seed

and they sell vhs tape of them in superhero costumes to a group of 3 people in the forest.

then, technically they will be richer if both have equal budgets.

 

then, if they sell it to other group from desert that is twice as poor that means they are still 50% richer from that another transaction.

 

3 people who pay 100%

and 3 people who pay 50%

 

The sneed store will have 100% + 100% + 50% = 250% budget so selling avengers to nigger countries and middle east still gives whoppin' 25% profit.

 

sneed store then goes back to their place and buys a bunch of beer to celebrate (in US). So, giving profit to the people of the country. Since they are relatively richer than others they can spend more money at the same time supporting businesses. This is external capitalism. Like in America in 1920.

 

Indians don't make most americans richer, they make a few people richer who in their stead make others richer too. But average american laborer becomes closer to indian, so less.

 

 

Internal profit is something like this.

 

The Chuck's new store opened and he sells vhs tapes of his c**k and donkey together, he sells it to 3 people in his town. He gets 200% profit from that. Then he uses this 200% on the town as well. That way making town overall the same wealth. Not extra wealth, but the same. This is beneficial to Chuck because he can make customers who are closer to him on personal level and even form bond with townspeople. Over time, he will get more customer and they will pay higher on their own violition. As Chuck upgrades he will also invite same people on his old jobs where they will be taking his place. This is internal capitalism.He makes less profit than globally which is serious in the future but no one has access to Chuck's c**k and donkey video tapes except for villagers.

but let's look at reverse scenario external ceapitalism scenario.

 

sneed sells to africans and gets revenue. now he is 250% richer. not only that but the africans dont have 50% income now either, they might only have half of it like 25% of profit. That means sneed became 500% richer upon the next upcoming transaction. That's 5 times richer than the tribe people. This could go to 10 or 20 times, 30 times, 50 times, 100 times... etc.

 

But what is exactly sneed's lifestyle and tribesmen lifestyle? It depends on what products you can buy internally. If tribesmen can produce, oil, their own rifles, their cars and shit. Then sneed is equally rich as them with exception of charactestics and the vhs tape.

 

They are both equal in richness on average with the people. The difference is that sneed is richer when comparing overall items to the unique vhs tape he is selling. Only VHS becomes expensive, the cars of both countries would probably be equal and the same goes for rifles. Personal choice is the only differetiation between global economies which puts in sitautionn in which the tribesmen are capable of competition.

 

However, lets say tribesmen have nothing except for manual labor. What if there are 3000000 tribesmen for each 1 townsperson in USA? That means even if they are 10 times lower income, the 30000000 tribesmen will still make higher source of income than 100% townspeople.

No sane person is praising you for the war.

if 1% of the tribe equals to 10000% of the townspeople. Then, the 100% overall can make more money than the people. Unless completely enslaved, but even enslaved will still waste more food than 100% townspeople which leads to that over the time 20% of the tribe who live inside the town will be forced to be paid the similar income as average worker and will make more profit. If they decide to combine the money they gained together they could form their own competitions, these competitions will make them make more average profit than the townspeople (to extent). At this point, Sneed's VHS tape should get more income sincce his customers are richer.

 

But for the majority of the townspeople that means they will make less median income, because the payment is lowered. And it also means his townspeople can't get richer since Sneed will be forced to spend income on the tribesmen in the country so now the tribesmen will get richer with him.

so question comes to mind. What if migration is not allowed? In that case sneed does make more money, and he constantly makes money. If this is fiction, then sneed is the mc of the show and that's the end.

 

But sneed is a fucking nigger, because overall he gets richer that means everyone in his town still gets poorer than he is. Technically, this could last for long time. And Sneed can keep getting richer off them without open migration until competition appears and forces changes to open migration for business benefits. Opened migration works, because it allows a single business get a hand over other business. With underpaid workers, it is easier to save budget and invest. Something that many business like fast food chains, real estate, banks and whatever likes. Still, let's say hypothetically migration border is never ever opened for the sake of oppurtunistic business owners. If Sneed spends his money in his town, then his people will get richer than him over time. To avoid that, Sneed can either save money and limit his progression by not investing (which would lead to townspeople getting richer) or spend his income in other place. Which leads to him giving money not to townspeople resulting in him being richer in his place, while spending money on others. Which makes them richer over time instead, simiarily if Sneed had some kind of tool to print money out of nowhere and leave 30% of that tool with him so he is infinitely rich, like "Fedral Reserve" that'd give him advantage but only until currency becomes weirdly long 0s.

so the end of this textwalls is that basically whites and jews can get richer but overall the richest person is the one who needs least in life, that's what I was trying to get at.

Also no sane person would be reading all these walls of text

And if you want to complain how poor your country is just go to /hs/ and tell them about it

okay pedophile then how about i kill you?

I've been wanting.

come here.

Why live?