And in replies you'd have obligatory hindu guy telling "actually, muslims also opress people, what about it, huh? avert the gaze from this hindu pissing on bloddied boy, and think about ummah!"
Indian caste system still exists? I found a twitter, where they report on daily cases like picrel
its insane
Dalits are literal subhumans. 2000+ years of oppression have turned them into a genetic dead end, they are literally incapable of dignified life. I don't think you understand to what degree they are fucked. It would be best for everyone if they were simply rounded up and killed.
Unfortunately a lot of higher caste Indians enjoy too much to have a mindless drone that sweeps the street after they shit on it and to vent their anger on whenever something goes wrong with their lives to allow it, alas.
how nuanced and anti-human.
heh, imagine...if this was in China and there was some internal division in China where one group of Chinese would treat another group very poorly. You'd never get into nuances, buddy, you'd never get into details what is the fault of the oppressed group supposedly is, you'd just brush stroke ALL Chinesese people as bad.
but you give Indians such wide margins of nuanced scrutiny and even justify inhuman treatment of youth. That boy if he were given good education, could write code no worse than any other pajeet, certianly no worse than owner of this site, but he is treated like shit for something that was beyond his control, his birth-caste.
It does not. It would be better for everyone if they didn't exist.
Nah, it's the exact same in China. This is how hundreds of millions of central plain folk are borderline retarded, and how things like that woman who was kidnapped and chained for the village to abuse happen. They are bred to be incapable of humanity through 2000+ years of being serfs in an empire.
Russia is similar, though the dehumanization period has been much shorter. But it was already apparent when after abolition of serfdom only few were capable of independent life. And they were reviled as kulaks, those who were!
I've met Chinese with more humanity than you, they would find child abuse like in this case abhorent and you find it tolerable and even propose outright genocide.
you said
>It would be best for everyone if they were simply rounded up and killed.
That would be millions innocent people, children, women, elderly. So in my eyes, you are more of a subhuman than any Chinese person. Only i wouldn't advocate genocide of the whole slovenian nation based on one degenerate example like, just to not stoop down to your subhuman level.
Indiscriminate compassion IS humanity. Indiscriminate genocide is dehumanized barbarism.
As i said - Chinese are much more human than you, even though you would claim otherwise. But i hope Chinese would allow them to be a little less mercifull when dealing with goons like you if your misbegotten kind dares to bring your subhuman indiscriminate destruction to Chinese world.
Shit like this is why India is going to be worse than China, if they ever attain huge power on international stage. Because if Indians were to become powerfull, their arrogance, demanding of reverance from everyone and belief in their impunity would breed so much trouble and violence.
For now the world is safe only because Pakistan is keeping them in stalemate state
If a country gets surplus money
China: lets build roads and bridges to decrease time of travel and stimulate economy!
@
India: LETS BUILD A GIANT STATUE TO LITERALLY WHO
i know this guy was defending lower caste and promoted buddhism, but really, what the fuck, this will only spur dumb hindus to build even bigger statues to warlords
Still, intresting that China listened to local population. And after this example they stopped building such ridiculous trash. China can place limits on ridiculous spending, same as when they restricted the building of super-tall skyscrapers. I don't think Indians will do this, because they have democracty and political parties could see ridiculous spending as the way of populism expression.
>listened to local population
nah, that part is made up too. the order came from the central government (ministry of housing) bc it violated the zoning plan.
it's also funny that you consider central government banning construction of skyscrapers taller than what their special protégés get to build as a serious limit.
>should've been outgrown
Lmao, idiot.
Monarchy is part of human nature, it is why even if you artificially outlaw it "because we're enlightened by our own intelligence" non-state entities will still function monarchistically; this includes both organised crime and big capital.
Besides that European monarchies are now sadly only ceremonial.
>trust me bro it's actually not really a monarchy because I get to pick which one of the five or six potential kings I get to back and they agree not to openly civil war each other
same applies to any pretenses of "republicanism" – it's all just a couple mafias existing on larger or smaller scale which get to change the mantle of the state depending on who holds the rest by the balls by the power of being able to threaten a popular revolt
pure hereditarian or several locally established families sharing the state, it is just a question of whether one king had the ability to eliminate the others or not
>My imaginary friends says those inbreds are superior to us all.
Take your pills, schizo.
Monarchies failed to create better defense superstructures than constitutional democracies, that is all. It all comes down to war and conquest.
That is why israel won over the ottoman empire, that is why México prevailed over france and spain, that is why USA and every colony before and after it eventually gets independence and that is why every monarchy that doesn't becomes vestigial appendages are conquered.
In a western perspective, I admit India is a weird exception.
>hurr durr this 18th century meme says everyone who has ever been successful was actually inbred
lol, lmao even
especially funny considering first cousin marriage is legal in mexico, because apparently it's a bit too popular among your peasantry
meanwhile the catholic church used to ban marriages of second cousins and closer
spanish habsburgs were a weird exception, yes (this is why they went extinct unlike other royal families)
> I get to pick which one of the five or six
Isn't it obvious that having even a couple of non-aligned rulers to choose from is already much better for the humanity? That brings in competition, this way the ruler is interested in making sure everyone is doing well and not only themselves and their powerful friends. That's also why decentralised government works better in the long term, that's why European monarchies became mostly ceremonial.
I'm not saying it isn't?
I should mention, I'm a feudalist, I detest absolutism.
I'm just telling you that you're delusional if you think possibility of existence of multiple rulers – or multiple levels of rulers – which have to compromise with each other somehow disproves that existence of the concept of rulerhood is immutable part of human nature.
>faith based leadership election
The what?
As if the delusion of democracy doesn't require much higher levels of faith in system not to fall apart...
