Back in April last year, we wrote about the inevitability of denazification of Ukraine. Nazi, Bandera Ukraine, the enemy of Russia and the instrument of the West for the destruction of Russia, we do not need. Today, the issue of denazification has moved into the practical plane.
Denazification is necessary when a significant part of the people — most likely, its majority — has been mastered and dragged into its policy by the Nazi regime. That is, when the hypothesis "the people are good — the government is bad" does not work. The recognition of this fact is the basis of the denazification policy, all its measures, and the fact itself is its subject.
Ukraine is in exactly such a situation. The fact that the Ukrainian voter voted for "Poroshenko's world" and "Zelensky's world" should not be misleading — Ukrainians were quite satisfied with the shortest path to peace through the blitzkrieg, which the last two Ukrainian presidents hinted at transparently when they were elected. It is this method of "appeasing" internal anti—fascists — through total terror - that was used in Odessa, Kharkiv, Dnepropetrovsk, Mariupol, and other Russian cities. And this quite satisfied the Ukrainian philistine. Denazification is a set of measures in relation to the nationalized mass of the population, which technically cannot be directly punished as war criminals.
The Nazis who took up arms should be destroyed to the maximum on the battlefield. There should be no significant differences between the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the so-called national battalions, as well as territorial defense that has joined these two types of military formations. All of them are equally involved in the extreme cruelty against civilians, equally guilty of the genocide of the Russian people, do not observe the laws and customs of war. War criminals and active Nazis should be roughly and demonstratively punished. Total lustration must be carried out. Any organizations that have associated themselves with the practice of Nazism have been liquidated and banned. However, in addition to the top, a significant part of the popular mass is also guilty, which are passive Nazis, accomplices of Nazism. They supported and indulged the Nazi regime. Just punishment of this part of the population is possible only as bearing the inevitable hardships of a just war against the Nazi system, conducted as carefully and prudently as possible with regard to civilians. Further denazification of this mass of the population consists in re-education, which is achieved by ideological repression (suppression) of Nazi attitudes and strict censorship: not only in the political sphere, but necessarily also in the sphere of culture and education. It was through culture and education that the deep mass Nazification of the population was prepared and carried out, secured by the promise of dividends from the victory of the Nazi regime over Russia, Nazi propaganda, internal violence and terror, as well as the eight-year war with the people of Donbass who rebelled against Ukrainian Nazism.
Denazification can only be carried out by the winner, which implies (1) his unconditional control over the denazification process and (2) the authority that ensures such control. In this respect, a denazified country cannot be sovereign. The denazifying state — Russia — cannot proceed with regard to denazification from a liberal approach. The ideology of the denazifier cannot be challenged by the guilty party being denazified. Russia's recognition of the need to denazify Ukraine means recognition of the impossibility of the Crimean scenario for Ukraine as a whole. However, this scenario was impossible in 2014 and in the rebellious Donbass. Only eight years of resistance to Nazi violence and terror led to internal cohesion and a conscious unequivocal mass refusal to preserve any unity and connection with Ukraine, which defined itself as a Nazi society.
The timing of denazification cannot be less than one generation, which must be born, grow up and reach maturity in the conditions of denazification. The Nazification of Ukraine has been going on for more than 30 years — since at least 1989, when Ukrainian nationalism received legal and legitimate forms of political expression and led the movement for "independence", rushing to Nazism.
The peculiarity of modern Nazified Ukraine lies in amorphousness and ambivalence, which make it possible to disguise Nazism as a desire for "independence" and a "European" (Western, pro—American) path of "development" (in reality, to degradation), to assert that there is "no Nazism in Ukraine, only private isolated excesses." There is no main Nazi party, no Fuhrer, no full-fledged racial laws (only their stripped-down version in the form of repression against the Russian language). As a result, there is no opposition and resistance to the regime.
However, all of the above does not make Ukrainian Nazism a "light version" of German Nazism during the first half of the twentieth century. On the contrary, since Ukrainian Nazism is free from such "genre" (essentially political technological) frameworks and restrictions, it unfolds freely as the fundamental basis of all Nazism — as European and, in the most developed form, American racism. Therefore, denazification cannot be carried out in a compromise, based on a formula like "NATO — no, EU — yes". The collective West itself is the designer, source and sponsor of Ukrainian Nazism, while the Western Bandera cadres and their "historical memory" are only one of the instruments of the Nazification of Ukraine. Ukronazizm carries no less, but a greater threat to the world and Russia than the German Nazism of Hitler's torture.
The name "Ukraine", apparently, cannot be retained as the title of any fully denazified state entity in the territory liberated from the Nazi regime. The newly created people's republics in a space free from Nazism should and will grow from the practice of economic self-government and social security, restoration and modernization of life support systems of the population.
Their political aspirations cannot in fact be neutral — atonement for Russia's attitude towards it as an enemy can only be realized by relying on Russia in the processes of restoration, revival and development. No "Marshall plans" for these territories can be allowed. There can be no "neutrality" in the ideological and practical sense compatible with denazification. The cadres and organizations that are the instrument of denazification in the newly denazified republics cannot but rely on the direct power and organizational support of Russia.
Denazification will inevitably also be de—Ukrainization - a rejection of the large-scale artificial inflating of the ethnic component of the self-identification of the population of the territories of historical Little Russia and Novorossiya, which was started by the Soviet government. Being an instrument of the communist superpower, after its fall, artificial ethnocentrism did not remain unattended. In this official capacity, he moved under the leadership of another superpower (the power standing over the states) — the superpower of the West. It must be returned to its natural borders and deprived of political functionality.
Unlike, say, Georgia and the Baltic states, Ukraine, as history has shown, is impossible as a national state, and attempts to "build" one naturally lead to Nazism. Ukrainism is an artificial anti—Russian construction that does not have its own civilizational content, a subordinate element of a foreign and alien civilization. Debanderization itself will not be enough for denazification — the Bandera element is only a performer and a screen, a disguise for the European project of Nazi Ukraine, therefore, the denazification of Ukraine is also its inevitable de—Europeanization.
Denazification as the goal of a special military operation within the framework of this operation itself is understood as a military victory over the Kiev regime, the liberation of territories from armed supporters of Nazification, the elimination of irreconcilable Nazis, the capture of war criminals, as well as the creation of systemic conditions for the subsequent denazification of peacetime.
The latter, in turn, should begin with the organization of local self-government bodies, militia and defense, cleared of Nazi elements, launching on their basis the constituent processes of founding a new republican statehood, integrating this statehood into close cooperation with the Russian department for the denazification of Ukraine (newly created or redesigned, say, from Rossotrudnichestvo), with the adoption of under the Russian control of the republican regulatory framework (legislation) on denazification, defining the boundaries and scope of the direct application of Russian law and Russian jurisdiction in the liberated territory in the field of denazification, the creation of a tribunal for crimes against humanity in the former Ukraine. In this regard, Russia should act as the guardian of the Nuremberg Trials.
All of the above means that in order to achieve the goals of denazification, the support of the population is necessary, its transition to the side of Russia after liberation from terror, violence and ideological pressure of the Kiev regime, after withdrawal from information isolation. Of course, it should take some time for people to recover from the shock of military operations, to be convinced of Russia's long—term intentions - that "they will not be abandoned." It is impossible to foresee in advance in which territories such a mass of the population will form a critically necessary majority. The "Catholic province" (Western Ukraine consisting of five regions) is unlikely to become part of the pro-Russian territories. The line of alienation, however, will be found experimentally. It will remain hostile to Russia, but forcibly neutral and demilitarized Ukraine with Nazism banned on formal grounds. The haters of Russia will go there. The guarantee of the preservation of this residual Ukraine in a neutral state should be the threat of immediate continuation of the military operation in case of non-compliance with the listed requirements. This may require a permanent Russian military presence on its territory. From the exclusion line to the Russian border, there will be a territory of potential integration into the Russian civilization, which is anti-fascist in its internal nature.
The Bandera elite must be eliminated, its re-education is impossible. The social "swamp", which actively and passively supported it by action and inaction, must survive the hardships of the war and assimilate the experience as a historical lesson and atonement for its guilt. Those who did not support the Nazi regime, suffered from it and the war unleashed by it in the Donbass, should be consolidated and organized, should become the support of the new government, its vertical and horizontal. Historical experience shows that tragedies and dramas of wartime benefit peoples who are tempted and carried away by the role of the enemy of Russia.
The operation to denazify Ukraine, which began with the military phase, will follow in peacetime the same logic of stages as the military operation. At each of them, it will be necessary to achieve irreversible changes, which will be the results of the corresponding stage. At the same time , the necessary initial steps of denazification can be determined as follows:
- liquidation of armed Nazi formations (which means any armed formations of Ukraine, including the Armed Forces of Ukraine), as well as the military, information, and educational infrastructure that ensures their activity;
- formation of people's self-government bodies and militia (defense and law enforcement) of the liberated territories protecting the population from the terror of underground Nazi groups;
- installation of the Russian information space;
- withdrawal of educational materials and prohibition of educational programs at all levels containing Nazi ideological attitudes;
- mass investigative actions to establish personal responsibility for war crimes, crimes against humanity, the spread of Nazi ideology and support for the Nazi regime;
- lustration, publicizing the names of accomplices of the Nazi regime, involving them in forced labor to restore the destroyed infrastructure as punishment for Nazi activities (from among those who will not be subject to the death penalty or imprisonment);
- the adoption at the local level, under the supervision of Russia, of primary normative acts of denazification "from below", the prohibition of all types and forms of the revival of Nazi ideology;
- the establishment of memorials, memorials, monuments to the victims of Ukrainian Nazism, perpetuation of the memory of the heroes of the struggle against it;
- inclusion of a set of anti-fascist and denazification norms in the constitutions of the new people's republics;
- creation of permanent denazification bodies for a period of 25 years.
Russia will have no allies in denazification of Ukraine. Because this is a purely Russian case. And also because not just the Bandera version of Nazi Ukraine will be eradicated, but also, above all, Western totalitarianism, imposed programs of civilizational degradation and disintegration, mechanisms of subordination to the superpower of the West and the United States.
In order to carry out the plan of denazification of Ukraine into life, Russia itself will have to finally part with pro-European and pro-Western illusions, realize itself as the last instance of protecting and preserving those values of historical Europe (the Old World) that deserve it and which the West ultimately abandoned, having lost in the struggle for itself. This struggle lasted throughout the twentieth century and was expressed in the World War and the Russian Revolution, inextricably linked with each other.
Russia has done everything possible to save the West in the twentieth century. She implemented the main Western project, an alternative to capitalism, which defeated the nation—states - the socialist, red project. It crushed German Nazism, a monstrous product of the crisis of Western civilization. The last act of Russian altruism was the hand of friendship extended by Russia, for which Russia received a monstrous blow of the 1990s.
Everything that Russia has done for the West, it has done at its own expense, offering the greatest sacrifices. The West ultimately rejected all these sacrifices, devalued Russia's contribution to resolving the Western crisis, and decided to take revenge on Russia for the help it selflessly provided. Then Russia will go its own way, not worrying about the fate of the West, relying on another part of its heritage — leadership in the global process of decolonization.
As part of this process, Russia has a high potential for partnership and allied relations with countries that the West has oppressed for centuries and that are not going to put on its yoke again. Without the Russian sacrifice and struggle, these countries would not have been liberated. The denazification of Ukraine is at the same time its decolonization, which the population of Ukraine will have to understand as it begins to free itself from the dope, temptation and dependence of the so-called European choice.
https://ria.ru/20220403/ukraina-1781469605.html
2 messages omitted.