omg i love gender ideology now
Gender ideology is white supremacy and post modern colonialism (Bernd2022-06-30 23:05:43 · 4yNo. 189181What many ignore is the enormous Eugenic effect generated by the LGBTI + movement thanks to the political support that supports it. The question is this. The social environment of our times is highly favorable for the proliferation of homosexual relationships , transvestism (or transgenderism) and bisexuality .
Previously, the policies of Radical Feminism (a movement already in disgrace and marginal) that had a lot of media and government support have generated a lot of distrust in the relationships between men and women and also generated an immense number of virgos and incels . In other words, young men, generally of low genetic quality, who are sexually frustrated by the impossibility of being in a relationship with a woman. Well, all of them become easy prey for homosexuality and transvestism. And thus they do not reproduce
And if among middle- class and Euro-descendant people the impact of policies for the social and legal promotion of LGBTI+ has a moderate impact , reaching only a relatively small percentage of them , the same does not happen with non-European people , and even more so if they come from sectors of low social level or, worse still, if they are marginal.
In itself, the investigations carried out in the United States confirm that, for example, ethnic groups such as African Americans , Latin Americans (non-white) and Asians were much more likely to try having homosexual relationships or become transvestites or transgender with differences that vary between 30 and 50% against erurodescendants. White ppl are less likely to be gay. The last CENSUS in the United States has shown that LGBT practices among African -Americans and Hispanics are 30-50% higher than among whites .
Afro - Americans , Afro-Brazilians , Afro-Caribbeans, and Sub- Saharan Africans , as well as mestizos and indigenous people in Latin America in early stages are very reluctant to homosexuality and transvestism, but only when complex large-scale social engineering policies manage to decompress and disintegrate the traditional social norms of their societies and communities, thanks to global policies (especially applied at the cultural level ), managing to generate acceptance towards LGBTI+, there are many third- worlders who are inclined towards this type of sexuality and gender.
In fact, at the level of percentages , they turn out to be so many that their number begins to have a considerable influence on the notable drop in birth rates in their respective countries and ethnic communities. And it is one of the main reasons why LGBT has so much weight and diffusion on a global scale that is due to its Eugenic impact of Birth Control .
Right now in the numerous slums and marginal neighborhoods of the Metropolitan Area of Buenos Aires you can see the impressive number of young men with a tendency towards homosexuality , with effeminate behavior and even a surprising number of men who decided to become transvestites or transgender to have a better socioeconomic status in their neighborhoods and be more in demand by men.
In fact, it is very important to highlight the importance of transvestites and transgender people in the villas and other marginal neighborhoods with ghetto characteristics. In these communities where we manage to turn their women into embittered feminists who feel distrust and even disgust and contempt towards their men that prevents many from having sex with them, at the same time the explosive emergence of transvestites accompanied by a growing social acceptance of this phenomenon , makes many focus their desires and relationships towards this minority group , but increasingly growing.
As a result, it is possible to reduce their birth rate, below the level of the replacement generation ( 2.1 children per woman), avoiding an overpopulation of unviable people who will not be able to adopt the technological and digital economy of Industry 4.0 and who are only liabilities for the State and its productive taxpayers.
It is also very important that people understand that for strategic reasons all the policies of Silent Eugenics including LGBT in the first stage have been applied in Western countries including Israel and later spread throughout Latin America , China , Southeast Asia , India , Sub-Saharan Africa and even by Arab and Muslim countries where LGBT is gaining ground, both legally and culturally despite immense resistance from Islamic conservatism.
And if a country with reactionary governments like Uganda or Indonesia tries to ban LGBT people and imposes homophobic laws , in this case it immediately begins to suffer severe condemnation and reprisals both from the UN and, above all, from supranational financial entities such as the IMF . , WB and the Davos Forum that begin to put economic and financial restrictions on the country in question, suffocating it economically so that they back down with their anti-LGBT policies, Queer Feminism, Legal Abortion or the Ecologist cause. They are methods ofsoft power that never fail.
Returning to the issue of the merely eugenic effects of LGBTI+, while lower-class gays and transgenders , generally of inferior genetic quality, have no chance of leaving offspring , and their lineage ends with them, completing a natural purification process, but at the opposite extreme there are gays and transgenders from the upper and upper middle class , with high purchasing power, an excellent quality of life and who are obviously people with very good genetics and high IQ who want and can also leave their offspringor at least have adopted children, but also excellent genetics.
Right now, gay couples with high purchasing power and thanks to surrogate motherhood, which is already legal in some countries, can father children by uniting their semen with their own DNA with the ovals of DNA banks in Denmark that have been in charge of collecting the spermatozoa and ovals of men and women with better genetics , better level of intelligence , excellent health and physical aesthetics based in most cases on Nordic appearance.
7 messages omitted.
First world countries are mainly the ones behind pushing these ideologies
First world countries are also the ones that are the most technologically advanced
First world countries with people inside of them who are the most subject to these technologies are also responsible for these ideas
Coincidence? I think not!
>What you looking at ese, you see something funny?
Your response?
4 messages omitted.
"We should be proud of the Ukrainian language, not love it. We love Ukraine, we love its nature, we love family, women and children, we love Ukrainian dishes and feasts! But you don't have to love the language you speak every day, you have to be proud of it. The antiquity of the Ukrainian language became indisputable for me a long time ago. Signs of the antiquity of the Ukrainian language often lay on the surface, did not require any deep research, but it was difficult to guess what antiquity it was, of what dimension. The Ukrainian people currently do not have any written records written in the Ukrainian language. There are almost no words of Ukrainian origin in Ukrainian etymological dictionaries - they come from Iranian, German, Turkish, Hungarian, Ossetian, Bulgarian, Lithuanian, Finnish, etc. Ukrainian archeology did not connect ancient cultures, but presented them as a discrete system of random settlements of Ukraine by migrants from Asia and Europe. Almost all the main national hydronyms or toponyms were also explained in all languages, but not in Ukrainian. And so, the time of truth is coming: genetics has established with mathematical precision that the progenitor of Indo-European languages is Ukraine. Namely, not the land, not the territory, because they do not know how to speak, and man is a native speaker. That is, everything is automatically turned upside down - the words in the large family of Indo-European languages come from the Ukrainian language, and not the other way around, as was believed until now. Language is always ideology. There is no doubt that the old ideology, built on great-power chauvinist foundations, will not surrender its positions without a fight. The extent of the defeat of the old language ideology cannot be imagined - millions of books, dictionaries, scientific works, etc. are turned into mountains of secondary raw materials. This is God's punishment for Catherine's destruction of old prints written in Ukrainian and for falsifying them in pseudo-Russian. The resistance is incredible. When Peter and Kateryna searched everything, down to the smallest piece of paper written in Ukrainian, everything was found and destroyed. Now it is hopeless to destroy something: in the information world - this is a blockade and counter-propaganda. Therefore, I am not at all surprised when Facebook blocks such a text as "To the question of the origin of the Ukrainian language". To be proud of the Ukrainian language is nationalism, it is an obstacle to a peaceful life, it is humiliation of other peoples? And what is the name of such a thing when the word "house" is Finnish-Ugric, "Dnipro" is Iranian, "plough" is German, "Cossack" is Turkish, and "Rus" is Finnish? Isn't this humiliating a Ukrainian? Isn't this "scientific" soil for those who squeal about calf language? Therefore, in a war, as in a war, let it be an ideological one. When someone undertakes to defend the Ukrainian language without a diploma in philology, then you should not listen to hysteria about unprofessionalism, you should remember those who went to defend the Ukrainian land when Russia attacked - who did not have a military education, but were a doctor, writer, mathematician, opera singer, etc. . Therefore, pride for the Ukrainian language comes first and we will win."
16 messages omitted.
[Killer] Yamagami stated that he held a grudge against a "particular religious group" and shot Abe because he believed that "the religious group and Abe were connected".
What religious group was he talking about?
9 messages omitted.
Thanks d*g I was born in Germany.
Imagine being Indian o.o
25 messages omitted.
2) What is even the "opinion" dude, like why do you operate definitions like that in discussion with me. Agenda, its called agenda - some editorial policy on what you are going to allow and what you are not going to allow, what you will cover and what you won't cover, what words you would use to describe actions of some actors and what words would you use to describe similar actions of different actors.
And behind the agenda there are always money. Governmnet actors don't just fucking donate money to news sources too, they often use intermediate stops. Like look at this shit. Government of the foreign country gives money to politician fund and then that fund will give scholarships and grants to people whom they want to be their pets who will tell things that they want to tell. Clinton Foundation recieves millions from Qatar, and then Clinton foundation will give 10000$ to aspiring new students who will become new journalists, but those "journalists" already would know that its nice to eat from the Clinton's hand. They won't bite that hand again - why do you want to bite the hand that feeds you? You want to go hungry, you want stomach crying out of pain because you have no money, and rent is due? Kids come to you and say "Mommy, where is our food? We are hungry!" and brave mother journalists is going to say "Listen kids, i don't give a fuck to your hunger, you understand? Today i asked Chelsey Clinton about Qatar money and they canceled my grant, but atleast i stuck it to the woman! Go sleep, you not eating not today, not tommorow. Da truth is above our hunger!"
Said no journalist woman ever
Not even going to read this long form cope; you are basically just wasting words around the fact that based on your assumption that nobody would be publishing opinionated walls of text without someone paying them for it, and the fact that you are yourself posting opinionated walls of text to deflect, one can only conclude that you're bot projecting and admitting that you yourself are a shill.
Pfff, weak give uper changing topics again and unable to keep up. i didn't claim to be a journalist, you fucking mongoloid, there is a difference between posting online while calling you a retarded NIGGER and claiming to be some above all else journalistic standard bearer serving ideals of independent coverage of news events while getting paid by the foundations and NGOs that actually order you like a fucking monkey boy to do their bidding under the disguise of ethical public service.
I moved to the States several years ago. And there's an interesting thing I noticed. There are plenty of soviet-born people that are still reminiscent of the Soviets. And what's more interesting, they perceive russia as a successor to it and want it to take over Ukraine.
People that live here for ten or more years root for russia cause they somehow tie it to the country where they grew up. This is so ridiculous!
Some more shit that I heard from them - "Zelenskiy should give up!", "Is it that hard for Ukrainians to do what Putin wants?", "I think it's only the beginning, soon russia will show it's full power.", "It was so nice in the Soviet Union, you're just victim to western propaganda!".
Is soviet mentality really indestructible? Is death the only salvation for these brainwashed zealots?
PS - younger people couldn't care about russia and they know how shitty it is.
1 message omitted.
I am the boss like Fidel Castro in Cuba
This is uncooked, it's a raw grease
I look like a soccer player, everybody says hello to me
I'm a rapper, I'm not a poet, fuck Neruda
There's no doubt that I'm going to become a millionaire
I don't have a street, what I have is more world than Super Mario
They have to give me the band of Toño Rosario
I'm going to die of cancer and you're going to die of sagittarius
