She took your v-card and then left you?
I'm gonna say the nigger word
39 messages omitted.
well, I guess you got me there, because I don't think society collapsing and humans dying out would be a bad thing and I also think that it's wrong to create a human without their consent (which is impossible to obtain beforehand); maybe I'm just a bitter old fart
bonus question: is worth of human life quantifiable? is life of a renowned music composer worth more than life of a waste collector person? it's a slippery slope
oh, and what if a woman can but doesn't want to bear children? is her life worth more or less then a man's? do we judge based on abilities alone or do actions factor in somewhere?
Pregnancy is not "creating people", it's just feeding and sheltering, no different from childrearing that happens outside the womb. But ofc it's true that only womyn can do it. But anyway, children are their own creators, they make themselves with their own genes with materials provided to them by their parents
A person's worth can take many different shapes and forms, but overall the rule of thumb as to how much a person is worth can be said that it depends on the amount of potential someone has to contribute something positive to society. As in, the main thing that defines someone's worth, is the ability to influence other people with what they are able to provide. Generally it can be said that the ability to contribute being how much a person is worth, could be potentially a very rigid form of determining how much someone is worth, but the general consensus of someone being successful in society is normally measured by not only just the individual's potential, intelligence and so forth, but also how it was applied in said person's life, which could in turn translate into what the common man refers to as success. That being said, however, there are still cases where a person has managed to influence society as a whole, while still not being considered conventionally successful by others. Success implies both being able to contribute meaningful things, but also the very impact someone has had. It could also be measured by the amount of money a person manages to make. There are many contributing factors related to an individual's overall worth and success in society. But in my own personal opinion, someone who is successful is someone who manages to earn an above average salary, while also contributing meaningful things to society.
>what if a woman can but doesn't want to bear children? is her life worth more or less then a man's? do we judge based on abilities alone or do actions factor in somewhere?
I would say that it's based on the ability, the woman in question doesn't necessarily have to be forced to have children in order for her worth to be determined, the mere possibility of pregnancy alone defines her worth. In theory such a person's worth should, and I am putting emphasis on should, be lowered to that of a man, but that is not the way things work. There's also the entire concept behind men being defensive of women, taking care of them and such, this is also related to the fragility that women display. I think a contributing factor to this would be that the most relevant people in society are male, therefore some of the rules society is made up of, some of the tendencies displayed in the mental aspect of how it functions, could be attributed to an idea that if society had been a human being, it would probably be a male. You could say that this is because of the patriarchy, but I think it goes deeper than that. It's autistic in nature, almost. And apparently a form of very logical and critical thinking, is a trait that males are on average most likely to manifest. Though not an exclusively male trait, it shows itself more often in males than females. Each sex have their own traits, society simply takes these traits into account and attempts to level the field given some of these qualities. Because men consider women to be fragile, society also fall victim to the same ideas. Society is just a set of autistic rules, but these rules are based around human behavior and qualities that present themselves in each person. It's all about the people that exist within society, society in itself is a living and breathing thing, things change often because people themselves also change. Things that once upon a time were considered logical and okay no longer are, because the people that exist within society have changed, society also changed with them. There's a mindset that many people have adopted, and wrongly, that society is some form of oppressing force that is designed to keep people down. While in reality, the only ones keeping eachother down are other humans. You can't blame your problems on society, because without humans then society wouldn't even exist to begin with.
it's interesting to see things from a different point of view; it certainly shows how much our opinions are shaped by our experiences
if we're judging people based on their contributions to society, then I'm going to assume that giving birth trumps anything else a woman could do (since, as you said, it's an ability unique to fertile women) - and if that is the case why not just say that women's sole purpose is having children? wouldn't that be a logical (and also very problematic) conclusion?
are women fragile, though? sure, on average they're physically weaker and smaller, but saying that they need to be protected and taken care of is inherently condescending; women aren't children and don't need to have men as their keepers. would you like to be looked down upon by a group of people who decided you're less capable? (btw I'm not saying you agree with that)
Why does a company like twitter has 7500 employees?
It's just a fairly simple website. I can't believe that you need more than 100 people to maintain something like that.
20 messages omitted.
And not for the reasons the left says so.
Ezra Pound once wrote that the slave mentality is best exemplified by those who wait for their savior. This perhaps best describes the right especially in North America.
Despite being aware liberals and their leftist allies disproportionately control virtually every influential institution and profession from academia to technology, the absolute best the right has been able to muster are a worthless coalition of proud contrarians, people with elitist temperaments, shut-ins, (pseudo)intellectuals and those with nothing to lose. This coalition does not inspire the necessary class of professionals from scientists, engineers, lawyers and thinkers to form a solid front against liberals and the left. Instead, we're treated to terminally online grifters telling their respective audiences what they want to hear and offering nothing to meaningfully improve their lives. Of those who want something more, they all suffer from crabs-in-a-bucket mentality and squabble over minutiae at the expense of fulfilling long term goals.
Honestly, it all fucking hurts so much and is too exhausting for words. You people are aware of all the problems yet still can't fight to save your lives. People like Keffals and Liz Fong-Jones have more power than Stephen Crowder or Nick Fuentes ever could.
9 messages omitted.
Entertain me.
24 messages omitted.
Fuck of boring neurotipical keins.
4 messages omitted.
Let's try this.
66 messages omitted.
yeah, there are also eyewitnesses who saw the whole thing
> A short while ago in Przewodów (Lubelskie Voivodeship), two rockets came from Ukrainian territory. One exploded in a field, and the other hit a corn collection point (idk what's the proper name for this, it's basically a place where farmers sell their produce in bulk) next door. My employee was mowing corn in another farmer's field when it happened. He also saw two rockets fly over. One hit the corn collection point, and the other fell in the field.
Won a prize at a grocery store for buying energy drinks. r8.
Packaging says that it has many purposes. You can put in on your backpack, clothes, tie hair with it, chain multiple items, put it in your mouth, spit it out, put it in your mouth again, trade with friends, collect them all. Fascinating.
11 messages omitted.
