trump threathening to back away from tesla and spacex contracts happened first and musk retaliated with the epstein leak
>Musk leaves DOGE
>President Trump gives Musk a farewell honor
>Musk criticizes Trump's policies (One Big Beautiful Bill) on social media
>Musk denounces President Trump's involvement in the Epstein case on social media
>President Trump fires back by threatening to break contracts with SpaceX and Tesla in an interview
>Musk responds by saying SpaceX is the one who will break NASA's contracts on social media
>Musk retracts his previous comments on social media
That's all for now. The egomaquia began this Thursday.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3e5y4g5qxno
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/06/05/politics/donald-trump-elon-musk-ugliest-comments-analysis
Excellent, thanks for the correction.
Indeed, Trump shot first when his law is criticized.
>epstein files are not released because Trump is in them
But Musk has a problem: it has no tangible evidence (the documents).
If you do not present them for public opinion and justice, it will only end up as an unfounded accuser. And if Encambio manages to present them publicly, he ended up seriously injuring Trump.
Musk is very rich, but I don't think he has the power to free the files. That's why I think it was a bad play on his part.
https://www.youtube.com/live/_4gWsKxCmOQ
Hey, bros!
I was trying to find answers and sources about Peter Thiel's (the dark lord) relationship with the Trump-Musk feud, and ChatGPT seems to systematically skip the topic. I presented him with the related pics, and only then did he give in to talking about techno-libertarianism, but then he kept ignoring my questions about his dark lord.
https://fortune.com/2025/05/21/peter-thiel-silicon-valley-trump-administration-elon-musk-jd-vance/
>Peter Thiel is the dark lord of OpenAI. He was a major investor in 2015, and Sam Altam is a Thiel entrepreneurial disciple.
YouTube: 3Fx5Q8xGU8k?si=prQo8kSE5hKRPm0v&t=10
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenAI#Management
Also:
Then I will treat faith to use a hard prompt. But I think he is censored.
Anti-government protesters take to the streets of L.A. to pressure the Trump administration.
YouTube: EjRTkoXpaaI?si=DrdMjT1youoLlws0
Liberals (political progressives) have always been bad people. They defend individualism (deconstruction, perspectivism, and other impostures) and ideologize everyday life (sexuality).
Conservatives have defended the community values that sustain social cohesion. But for some time now, they have allied with libertarians, who are also individualists and also unrestrictedly pro-capitalist, to combat the leftist bloc (Wokism, socialism, and communism).
Now that they have gained institutional power, this alliance is breaking down, and conservatives stand alone against the Wokists.
<Trump: Conservative, nationalist ("patriot" and protectionist).
<Musk: Technolibertarian (State reductionist, globalist, individualist, accelerationist).
The only thing that unites conservatives and libertarians is anti-Wokism. But pure libertarians do not fight for the national economy or for workers in industrial or rural areas.
https://www.theadvocates.org/the-difference-between-libertarians-and-conservatives/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_conservatism
Aslo:
Socially, progressives (liberals) and libertarians come from the same ideological root of philosophical liberalism. And they also share the preservation of private property.
At their core, they share the same individualistic (socioeconomic) "evil gene".
See the sharp criticism of the eminent and controversial political theorist: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Schmitt
>Liberals have always been bad people
Most of the Polandball community is liberal btw.
>Conservatives have defended the community values that sustain social cohesion
Does that include 764 and Fannyfun who post CP and gore to Krautchan? This is war Bernd stop acting like the right wing media is correct! Look at AIDS, look at hitler, look at Leviticus, right winged politics is evil. I am a liberal because the other guy sucks, the problems of libertarianism are very clear too me that most liberals choose to ignore, I am not blinded to their evil but I think I would rather be like them than be conservative and the right.
>political progressives
Is good because we are moving forward in the world, not back.
Everyone is free to choose their path. In your case, you're allying yourself with dark lords like George Soros (promoter of immoral policies, market manipulator, election intervenor—a defender of democracy—and all this with the money he makes through speculation—financial capital). Even if you don't recognize it, he's your ideological ally because he promotes "progressive liberalism."
You could tell me, "But I have nothing to do with George Soros and his methods," but at the same time, you demand that conservatives answer for what Hitler did...
That's your side, and those are the lords who operate within it.
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/04/nonprofit-financed-by-billionaire-george-soros-donated-140-million-to-political-groups-in-2021.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Society_Foundations#Activities
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_projects_supported_by_George_Soros
>Is good because we are moving forward in the world, not back.
Given the current dynamics, if we're talking about social and economic development, the true progressives are the accelerationists who want to accelerate political and economic progress. Liberals are rather reactionary and anti-accelerationists (even for left-wing accelerationists).
That's why they're increasingly losing ground (in the US and Europe, not to mention in China and Russia, where they have no influence). This is also a danger for the old conservatives (Trump depends on Musk, a techno-libertarian). If anything, liberals are weakening (part of what's happening in L.A. is a reactionary attitude among liberals).
https://www.britannica.com/topic/accelerationism
>Accelerationists argue that technology, particularly computer technology, and capitalism, particularly the most aggressive, global variety, should be massively sped up and intensified – either because this is the best way forward for humanity, or because there is no alternative. Accelerationists favour automation. They favour the further merging of the digital and the human. They often favour the deregulation of business, and drastically scaled-back government. They believe that people should stop deluding themselves that economic and technological progress can be controlled. They often believe that social and political upheaval has a value in itself.
>Accelerationism, therefore, goes against conservatism, traditional socialism, social democracy, environmentalism, protectionism, populism, nationalism, localism and all the other ideologies that have sought to moderate or reverse the already hugely disruptive, seemingly runaway pace of change in the modern world. “Accelerationism is a political heresy,” write Robin Mackay and Armen Avanessian in their introduction to #Accelerate: The Accelerationist Reader, a sometimes baffling, sometimes exhilarating book, published in 2014, which remains the only proper guide to the movement in existence.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/11/accelerationism-how-a-fringe-philosophy-predicted-the-future-we-live-in
Vid related: >>343074
>George Soros
No shit Bernd, I hate all the mother fuggers in high power that are liberals. I still like them more than I like the conservatives, you seem conservative yourself, that’s fine Bernd free to choose their path.
>progressives are the accelerationists
Who I agree with, but also the social standards that the left give looking at MDCs much of there value are liberal, only recently are they switching.
>dark lords
If George Soros are considered a dark lord than what does that make choronzon?
>No shit Bernd, I hate all the mother fuggers in high power that are liberals. I still like them more than I like the conservatives, you seem conservative yourself, that’s fine Bernd free to choose their path
Okay. I don't like Hitler or his racism either. But embracing immorality under the guise of progress strikes me as an excuse to pass off motives as reasons.
>progressives are the accelerationists
Word games don't change reality as if they were a set of words. Just as repeating a thousand times that a woman doesn't turn a transvestite into anything other than a transvestite.
Acceleration brings with it a new individualism that has little to do with gender ideology and self-perception, nor with the "independent" model of women, the reactionary feminism represented by "feminists."
>If George Soros are considered a dark lord than what does that make choronzon?
Each side has its dark lords... >>342976
who said that democracy truly belonged to the voters? (There are those who believe that theories are reality and then get upset when things don't work out the way they were told.)
But in ancient and sacred Greece, lords of the masses already existed.
The question remains: Who are you with?
>I don’t like racism
Why not?!?!? I never said you did, you’re ok Bernd.
>Who are you with?
Center left, there is a lot I disagree with my fellow liberals (like the protest) but over all I see it as a step forward. If you mean Who am I with as in a political leader than no one I just vote for the less bad person.
>Each side has its dark lord's
Agreed, but my point was right winged politic’s lord is darker.
President Trump is celebrating the 250th anniversary of the military, which coincides with his birthday.
Anti-government dissidents are taking advantage of the opportunity to hold a political demonstration "in the name of democracy" (even though they disrespect the elected administration and seek to pressure it with marches).
From the creators of "Con Argentina nunca te vas a aburrir": USA.