I want to address the part of Hitler's paintings. Lot of criticism is directed towards it, I saw even Bernd shat on them when the topic came up, or someone posted them.
The matter of fact is they aren't bad.
When it comes to drawing or painting 90% of the population is stuck at a 5yo's doodling, and they couldn't produce anything nowhere close to what Hitler painted. Yes, it is also a fact that as artistic works, they aren't special, and from a "professional" point of view "professionals" I put these in quotes for we are talking about artists... can form justified criticism. This is why he applied to college so he could learn more about art, and how to develop his artistic style. To get formal education, and get better. This was denied from him. So that justified criticism is not that much justified, since he was a young amateur whose style isn't matured yet.
Those pictures aren't bad, they are shat on because they were made by Hitler.