Specific example, please I never heard of village vs city
Two of the most interesting civil wars in history were wars between the city and the village, and both times the city was victorious, giving a good spanking to retarded rural animals.
Now I realized that any civil war is a war between the village and the city, and both Russian and American civil wars were genocides of the stupid part of the population. Village only breeds stupidity and poor taste unless it's guided by the city.
Sometimes the village wins, like in Spain.
This is a new concept by me, you heard it here first.
> any civil war is a war between the village and the city
Yes, kind of. Except for some third world civil wars where most participants do not represent any local population.
> stupid part of the population
If the "smart" part has to resort to genocide it ain't smart.
> Village only breeds stupidity and poor taste
I don't think that's always true. As you noted cities bred communism, and other radical shit also usually comes from the cities, not the villages.
Huh? Russian civil war was exactly opposite, crapitalists got fcked by literal villagers. It was a class war.
American civil war just a fight for power between crapitalists. I doubt your theory can even be applied to that case.
Cities bred communism? Huh again? First communist state which is ussr was 90% villagers.
> Huh? Russian civil war was exactly opposite, crapitalists got fcked by literal villagers. It was a class war.
BO, pls. The Reds were led by city slicker intellectuals/factory intelligentsia, the Whites were led by landlords. Both parties would always use yokels but it's the leadership that shapes urban/rural nature of a movement. Same goes to American CW: progressive city slickers lead northerners, both city workers and rural yokels into fight with a landlord mobement.
>wars between the city and the village
I like this simplification. Or essentialization perhaps.
>It was a class war.
Lolno. No "class war" was ever fought in history.
>The Reds were led by city slicker intellectuals/factory intelligentsia
>the Whites were led by landlords.
Russia had a large mass of peasantry and a comparatively small group of workers (they were a lot, but if we compare their ratio to peasantry they were relatively small group). The civil war was essentially a war between your "factory intelligentsia" and "landlords", who fought for the power over the mass of peasantry by making the peasants kill each other ie. the average soldier on both sides was a peasant.
Btw the Soviet forced industrialization was also an effort to destroy peasantry as much as possible and make workers out of them, communists hate peasants, because they can be self-sufficient, but workers are dependent on the services the state provides. Same with cities. Urbanites can be choked by cutting basic services - stopping food, water, electricity, heating - therefor easier to keep in check. Funny consequence was the dacha system where workers had to do agricultural work on the weekend so they can maintain a bare minimum of living standards.
You are a retard. The Soviet Union executed a forced industrialization to build up heavy industry (they forced all the occupied Eastern Euro countries to do the same after WWII). It has nothing to do with industrialization like how the production of wealth moves from agriculture to industry, then from industry to services in modern society itself.
