Even if everybody is of the same race and speaks the same language there will still be conflicts between regions. Humans tend to form groups and antagonize against groups that they don't know.

retard detected

this is where space exploration will come in handy

ofc it doesnt have anything to do with the real kalergi but neither is schwab the man behind bogdanoffs

Based

practical implications???

That's p much the current situation.

It's time for all the good people to unite and kill all the bad people!

 

I would rather see the world divided into small states rather than a one world goverment. We could also achieve peace withouth having to melt humanity into a identityless brown pool with every country having nukes. If India and Pakistan didnt had nukes they would be fighthing a war.

 

 

 

Interstelar exploration is science fiction propaganda, not even with the gravity force of the Sun we could reach the stars quickly enough.

 

What we will have is superpowers fighting for space rocks when space minings becomes profitable.

I'm a Kalergist btw

Transfer military and police budgets to something really useful like setting up a base on mars and we will have it + cancer defeated and humans living for 200 years

 

Whats the point of humans living in Mars ? Its a desert wasteland 1000 times worser than the Mojave (fallout), there is 0 chance for multicelular life, even if you manage to build one with oxygen, water and food (supplied from earth), the low gravity would slowly fuck your body.

 

Most of the time you will stay inside your base doing nothing usefull.

 

Imagine how many taxes would require to mantain a base like that. It would be a parasite for any country..

 

Its better to fix the Earth rather than living in a wasteland.

No, war is a fair price to pay for being able to have different languages and ethnicities in the world

 

And war is extremely rare nowadays anyway

kys right away

Yo haven't you heard Putin? World government failed and the reason we have conflicts emerging globally is precisely because WG was shit, new multi-polar world is the goal and mainstream idea.

BS, religios, ethnic and national conflicts is a product of crapitalism scum.

Yeah, that's probably why religious, ethnic and national conflicts historically globally basically disappeared when economies transitioned to "crapitalism".

Google conflicts by date then come back.

yeah 1) totally not influenced by recency bias, look at wars in europe before and after "crapitalism" and 2) uprisings instigated by you subhuman commie scum do not have attributes of being "religious, ethnic or national" (unless you consider marxism to be a religion I guess)

there was no "after crapitalism"

"during crapitalism" then

I'm sure "crapitalism", which has created "multikulti" "majority-minority" cities like New York and modern London is somehow something that produces ethnic and religious conflicts lmao

crapitalism did not created "multikulti" "majority-minority" anything, it's same shit like saying it created water or air.

yeah

I'm sure half the world trying to move into London and NYC is completely unrelated to the banking and cultural capital parked there

slovenia is not half of the world i'm sorry.

 

Marxism is kinda a religion, there are a lot of different interpretation of Marxian texts, thats why you have a lot of marxists infighthing between trotskites, maoists, stalinists, castrists, denguists, left anarchists_...

 

I wonder would leftists infight end if Marx is somehow "revived", like making an AI with Marx personality and politics based on his books.

You can call anything a religion by applying this logic.

 

Everyone who is not a pragmatist have a cult like mentality. And most of Marxist seem to be that..

 

"NOOO, TROTKSY IS NOT A TRUE MARXIST"

 

"NOO, STALIN IS RED FASCIST"

 

"TITO IS A REVISIONIST AND TRAITOR TO THE WORKING CLASS"

 

"MILOSEVIC IS A FASCIST"

 

"MARX DIDNT MEAN THAT"

 

You have Santiago Armesilla and Roberto Vaquero fighthing, both of them accuse each other of not beign a true marxist or a marxist directly.. (Roberto Vaquero said that Armesilla should stop naming himself a Marxist)

 

Is like christian denominations infighthing over who follows God properly..

its not about mentality its about being idealistic or not.

 

Orthodox Marxists are idealistic.. They want an anarchist society (marxian endgoal), with no classes, state, police, money, borders, etc...

 

The fact that they fight each other because one of them claims to have the true interpretation of Karl Marx, deciding who is a revisionist and who is not how shows idealistic they are.

Do you even understand what that means?

 

Yes, i understand, Marxist follow their own ideals, their "perfect and flawless" utopian society, just like christians have the kingdom of heaven

idealism is when you believe theres a "universe of ideas" that somehow shapes the world around you, there are many of idealisms: christians believe in ideal world after death, schopenhauer said theres a trascendental Will that manifests itself in material world on different levels, solipsist believes only his ego exists and everything else is just his imagination.

 

materialism is just when you blindly believe your own senses

 

marxism's dialectical materialism says the world is unknowable (just like idealists) but with science and logic we can at least get closer to knowing it

What is "science and logic" other than exactly that, the concept of there being ideals that govern reality?

idealists just instantly giving up when it comes to knowing reality thru materia, they only care about thinking and theoretising

 

dealictical materialists still admit that reality is unknowable (so they are still idealists in the core) but they say we can use matter and senses to get at least somthing

 

this is how i understand it, materialism - matter first, consciousness later; idealism - consciousness first, matter later. But i dont think this is right to talk about idealism as a whole, firstly we need to choose one and then discuss