I asked another AI
No, the result is not the same as in the original text. The original text claims there are 10 to 14 deaths per square meter, but this is incorrect and seems to be a misunderstanding.
When the calculations are done correctly, the result is much smaller. We calculated that for the lower estimate of total fatalities (1.5 billion):
1.5 billion / 148.94 * 10^12 = 10.06 * 10^-6 deaths per square meter
And for the higher estimate of total fatalities (2 billion):
2 billion / 148.94 * 10^12 = 13.42 * 10^-6 deaths per square meter.
This means there are approximately 0.00001 to 0.000014 deaths per square meter, not 10 to 14.
The mistake in the original text seems to come from a misunderstanding of units. The result of the division is in deaths per square meter, not deaths per square kilometer. There are 1,000,000 square meters in a square kilometer, so the original calculation is off by a factor of 1,000,000.
So, the correct interpretation of the calculation is that there are approximately 0.00001 to 0.000014 deaths per square meter of land on Earth, or 10 to 14 deaths per square kilometer. This is a much lower density of deaths than the original text suggested.