Yes there are many of them and you knew the answer.
Is there a single woman who is not mentally ill? I don't mean that in an insulting sense, but everywhere I see women who have depressions, are bipolar, have an anxiety disorder etc. What's up with that?
Not quite. Progressives maybe will try to normalize this but only amongst LGTBs. For example: see feminist (lesbian) sex dialectics. However seeing a traditional couple like this is the worst nightmare for them. The will never allow it simply because they hate hetero normativity too much and they need every chance and motive to demonize men. The result is npcs that fancy themselves conservative, react violently to the mere idea of age difference but silently accept when is a woman is doing the pedo touching.
Just remember. Just 20 years ago gays still used to be chased by the government but now suddenly all magic and love.
My bad Hans. I just wanted to contribute to the discussion but I underestimated the idiocy of the moralfaggot. Although not deviating too much from my previous answer, I would say that the reason many women (and men as well for that matter) are mentally ill in our society is because is all strictly controlled, even in this era of fake sexual liberation. People are nothing but cattle in increasingly small cages, and cattle in small cages tend to go sick and crazy.
>do not put the other spic in the same package.
Why do people put so much emphasis on Mexico when it comes to illegal activities and crimes?
Literally the only reason why Mexico is a center for organized crime and drug dealing is due to its location in the world, bordering the US, making it the prime location for drugs to spread out towards the US. It's not even like Mexicans are more violent or more prone to drug dealing, it's literally all due to its geographic location which makes it much easier for drug dealers to smuggle drugs into the US and get money for it. So, again, why the exclusive association with Mexico and criminal activities, when arguably most of Latin America also have the same problems with crime? If you think about it, if countries south of the border, countries that produce the drugs that are smuggled into the US through Mexico, didn't exist, then Mexico wouldn't have had the bad reputation it currently has with drug smuggling. They don't even create the drugs, they're only responsible for moving the drugs, and that is the main reason why they have the reputation of a violent criminal country. It's not that Mexicans are more likely to commit crimes than other Latin Americans, it's literally all due to its place in the world, Mexicans aren't worse than the other Latin Americans, they're the same.
>But you never see videos of Colombians dismembering people, instead there are even pages like el rincon del narco where you get literally hundreds of videos of Mexicans dismembering people.
Wouldn't that have something to do with the fact that drug dealers and narco cartels are territorial, whereas in Colombia they don't need to be that territorial since they can just produce and export their drugs peacefully and have no reason to make examples of people in order to send messages throughout the cartel world that they have more influence over the drug dealing? It happens for a reason, it's not like Mexicans are just evil people and do things without there being a rational reason behind it. Cartels compete with eachother in drug smuggling, many times they are required to be violent in order to display dominance over other cartels, it all has its roots in the drugs they could potentially smuggle into the US. If a cartel is feared then they have a larger influence over smuggling, are capable of making more money, become larger organizations with more power, drowning out smaller cartels with displays of violence that get them respect in the criminal world. If there had been no cartels to smuggle drugs, if the drugs that came from the south in Latin America didn't exist then there wouldn't be as much territorial violence as there is today, there would be no struggle for power that is very evident in the violence that takes place in Mexico. It's organized crime, all of the cartels' main purpose is generating as much money as possible, and they all want to be the top dogs hence the amount of violence that exists, the main victims of these violent crimes are other cartel members for the most part. If a cartel is making a lot of money then they decide to become more violent and push fear into the world of organized crime, which secures their position in the world of cartels.
Nice strawman, noncefaggot.
t. peruvian CP watcher
Kill yourself, nonce.
>It's simple, it's called the right of war.
>It is different from raping the little girls of your family, which is what happens in countries like Peru, Brazil or Mexico.
Reminder: according to right of nonce sting, I have the right to rip out your guts and feed you to them
I think one of the main traits that Mexican criminals have is the fact that they are disposable, their lives aren't worth that much and they build their entire organizations and cartels around that idea. I personally would like to think that this is due to the fact that they have more opportunities for making money by being so close to a first world country, basically, anything goes, and they get away with simpler strategies to smuggle drugs into the US simply due to the fact that they have numbers and for every Mexican caught there are 3 that go through the border easily. But here we are, differentiating between Mexican cartels and Latin American cartels when in the eyes of anyone that isn't Latin American we are all the same. Also, if we're talking about violence in itself then we should at least mention the fact that Central American countries and their cartels are also incredibly violent and operate more or less in the same way a Mexican cartel would. MS13 is one of the gangs that are present even in the US and have many members, supposedly very violent individuals as well. I think I understand the comparison you made to Scarface, as I said earlier, Mexican criminals are disposable and their lives under the eye of the cartel aren't worth very much, but I think this phenomena applies to all Latin American cartels as a whole. In the eyes of someone who isn't Latin American, all cartels are the same as Mexican ones, so I don't understand why we should be alienating Mexican cartels to others that exist in Latin America, when they're all associated with eachother for foreigners.
>If you think about it, if countries south of the border, countries that produce the drugs that are smuggled into the US through Mexico, didn't exist, then Mexico wouldn't have had the bad reputation it currently has with drug smuggling
If the drug mafia supported by the US since previous century would no exist, we won't we talking about this lol.
