There are three modern disciplines that grants us unique insights into reality. The first two being history and anthropology which allowed us to discover new modes of Being and questioning the grounds of our own mode of Being, also efforts were made to find a general law that could motivate this metamorphosis of the modes of Being. Because three centuries even the most insignifiant tribe in Amazonia believed their own gods to be ruling the cosmos and others to be in error. Third one is psychology, analysing something as big as morals as being motivated by personal traits, failed will to power, short-comings, childhood traumas. The idea running around is more or less that most people have them unconsciously and I would say that it stains their action with subjectivity, their actions will always be related to their own body of desires and shit, it kinda makes us see bad people as sad people, emperors as having frustrated inner childs, could be just a cope these people lacking achievements have, it's getting to the point that a girl made a poem about what she would have done if she was Putin's mother, I think this is a very interesting phenomena, the disbelief that action of your opponents could be pure from the stain of individuality, I say opponent because this is also a strategy to ridicule people you don't like while claiming that your side is somehow motivated by pure love. Many no longer believe in it, but I think that's the value of religion, to have disinterested altruistic action and in this sense love is extremely virile, it's superior to indifference because indifference still represents an attachment to the enjoyments of the senses. Love is moving the center of your life away from yourself and to others, away from your own past. Some people don't believe in love. I believe.