What do you think about the new image board shooter? Was he in the right or a mentally ill murderer?
rebelous Americans used to shoot the presidents
what the point of killing a bunch of niggers in the mall? It doesn't send any message and it doesn't achieve any results - whether you succeed or fail
read about some mutts who tried bigger
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Byck
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hinckley_Jr.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giuseppe_Zangara
These guys have a wiki page, they will be remembered as political figures, they influence the decision making of the presidents, because presidents FEAR them, they fear that there will be consequences for their actions. Does Biden gonna change his mind out of fear that some fat lard retard is going to get furrious and ride to kill a bunch of niggers in the mall?
I heard school shootings can be prevented by giving students guns. Imagine a scenario, where somebody sees the school shooter and shoots him, then an another guy sees this guy shooting the school shooter and thinks he is the school shooter shooting him, third one comes and sees somebody shooting people and so on... With a chance there would be one guy left and everybody has shot eachother.
Sounds like school battle royales...
I'd give them non-lethal weapons. Imagine a school full of students with stun guns. They won't be afraid to use it against some real shooter as they would be if they had a real gun instead.
The only problem is that stun gun still can be lethal if used the wrong way...
Well a school with 500 people there would be at least 5 psychopaths who could shoot a shooter with a handgun since psychopaths are 1% of population. However I doubt anyone would go near a school shooter with a taser unless they try to ambush the shooter, and I believe they would prefer to leave the building as fast as possible instead.
Why would anyone not prepared chase a school shooter, lol. If you try to play a hero in real life hoping to tackle the bad guy, there are very high chances, that something will go wrong and you will fall down and spaghetti will spill out of your pockets, while schoolshoter laughs and then finishes you off with the shot in the head.
In real life you are usually not prepared for confrontation, you may be in constricting clothes, with filled bladder, have phone in your pocket ready to ring in the wrong moment, your shoes are going to give up and betray you, like hundreds things can go wrong, like rolling snake eyes on dice. Even if you have a taser, it will fail you - 100% or the bad guy will dodge it. And then you will stand there like a retard not knowing what to do, while baddie aims at you ready to kill
If the shooter is already in the shooting rage you're right, only a psychopath could stop them. Though if he's only about to begin somebody close to him could try to intervene.
Sure. But if everyone has a taser chances at least one of them will hit the shooter are quite good. And people won't be afraid to use it as they know it isn't lethal.
Dude, the range of the tather is patheric. Plus it doesn't work on people with thick closing. Booffalo probably had a vest on him, he was all geared up. He dropped it when they were arresting him to show he has no hidden guns.
But if the shooter gears up like Rampage movie style in armor, then your tathers will not do anythin
But it does leave marks.
> at some point the victim would taser him
Less bullying then?
Yeah, you're right unfortunately. Another problem of taser is that it isn't completely safe and still may cause serious damage or even death as I told.
I was more like talking hypothetically, if tasers (or any other ranged non-lethal weapon) would be improved enough to compete with shooters.
Despite /pol/ deliberately rooting for RMS and marketing extremism as a solution for 6+ years, when some retard goes and does it it's a glowjob.
Glad this happened so we can start talking about dumb people being exposed to ideas they're not mentally equipped to handle in our society. Provocative websites like 4chan are way above most people's intellectual capacity of comprehension, same way with many video games and films and even music (the lowest threshold of entry from all media) as well as political literature.
Media is blamed for violence, but really it's the stupid consumer that takes bad influence, and it all spreads via internet. What happened fifteen years ago when portable consumer tech led to the great unfiltering is only the cherry on top. Let's fix the issue by making WWW solely accessible from universities, and confine the sheep to heavily regulated online spaces like Habbo Hotel where they won't run into, nor participate in the spreading of ideas without having the necessary level of schooling or critical thought required to process them.
any person with IQ higher than 80 could see through trolling of this sort
i mean its one thing to freak out or get upset about some trolling online, but its other thing to get motivated by trolling online into doing something physical and risky for your own life
like any person with a brain could realise nothing will be achived. Anyone fucking remembers Las Vegas 2017 shooter? They guy shot almost a thousand people, i mean wounded, dead were 60 or so. And so what happens next, what did he achive? Nothing, nada, zilch. Just shot a bunch of NPCs, like real fucking NPCs the ones who stop existing when you turn away from them, they just stop being rendered by the universe, so insignificant their lives. But the retards think that killing these nobodies is like changing anything?
prolly those shooters have mental problems and wanted suicide, but they latch on to /pol as to give their deaths some meaning without really thinking much