I find both the ultratraditional way and the ultramodern way to be misogynistic and bad both for women and for men in the long term.
In the traditional way a woman is just a household item that you buy from her parents (= manufacturers) for a couple of sheeps. She has to wear some clothing that hides her features men of her culture deem sexualised (be it her hair, ankles or the entire body) so that only her husband has to see and enjoy the sight of her body. Essentially, a living sex toy slash vacuum cleaner.
In the modern way a woman is just a human animal bred to provide sex services to male human animals. She is raised to believe that this is freedom. The more virile men she have serviced in her life - the freer she is. Essentially men for her are living sex toys and walking wallets (those are different types of men). Her clothing is designed by "fashion industry" brands to emphasize her loose morals and promiscuous personality. She would never know love - only lust. Starting a family is on the bottom of her aspirations list. If she'd manage to do that she will put all her frustrations and psychological complexes on her husband, cheat on him with more virile men, divorce him, take their children away from him and turn them into transgender freaks to parade on her facebook.
I so wish that there was a sexual evolution instead of the sexual revolution, because the sexual revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.