What happens if Biden wins?
Will Drumpft throw some bombs between November and January?
Will Joe make any big changes?
It's entirely possible.
I mean, you can't do worse than Trump in terms of assembling a team. He fires people all the time for the dumbest of reasons and now his cabinet basically consists of the only people who are still willing to work for him.
If you think BLM is driving too many people to the republicans, you might consume too much right leaning propaganda. Polls show that coronavirus and the economic situation are most important to voters and the majority of Americans supports BLM.
That's wrong.
Polls were correct about the popular vote. The real results were within the margin of error. They didn't really predict the states very accurately, though, so Trump didn't win the popular vote, but the electoral college. The 98% number wasn't polls, that was main stream media pundits saying "this is the probability that Hillary wins" and wasn't based in facts, but their opinion.
>What happens if Biden wins?
its dont
the MSM viewership has been dwindling steadily since the 2016 cycle
drumpf and his antics are literally the only thing that is keeping them afloat
imo, stealing the DNC nomination from bernie again was the final nail. we will see even more disenfranchised voters on the left than we did in 2016.
people seem to think that the civil unrest will for some reason push more people to vote left. i gotta say i dont see it. if anything it will do the opposite. the dem party has a hell of a time trying to get their voting base into the booths in normal times. now, its looking like most voting will be done by mail. older conservative voters are already familiar with this format. lefties will be more inclined to just bitch and moan and/or set more things on fire really do wish theyd start burning more walmarts and shit tho tbh.
hell, a good amount of these lefties are too radical to even be registered
speaking hypothetically, what would happen is that joe would die very quickly, kamala would become pres, and then speaker of the house pelosi would become VP
as these are all status quo candidates, the only thing we would see is a continued steady decline in literally everything.
all legally registered guns would be seized in no-knocks.
to the best of their ability, all small and even mid-sized biz would be eradicated via legislation.
i can imagine kamala trying something retarded like mandating muh reperashuns for muh poor PoCs.
etc
idk, the sky or rather the core of the earth is the limit
but like i said, i really dont see it
even apolitical people are getting really fucking fed up with all this retardation in the streets every night. its been all fucking summer.
voting is still closed ballot. the people who may have been biting their tongues these past few years will likely voice their opinions on the ballot.
its unfortunate that blumpf and his whole cabinet is just another fucking zionist stooge, but thats the bipartisan faggotry that we call a representative republic, innit?
I know that Nate Silver and fivethirtyeight has written a lot about how their polls were actually historically accurate, it's just that this race was so close that even a small margin of error could wrongly predict a result. For instance, if you predict that a candidate will win by 1% but they end up losing by 1% (as was the case with most of these "horribly biased and inaccurate" 2016 polls) then your prediction is still more accurate than predicting that a candidate will win by 10% when they actually win by 5%, because in the former your margin of error is only 2% and in the latter it's a whole 5%. The average person just doesn't understand statistics very well, and people were both placing too much trust in a certain outcome for a very close race and felt either very disappointed or vindicated when tge results were not as predicted. This created a convenient scapegoat of bad pollsters who the left could blame for Trump's victory and the right could blame for his low popularity, even though the pollsters did a fairly good job of accurately showing the closeness of the race.
mostly agree tbh
that said there were quite a few blatant ones that were so horribly inaccurate that i can only assume that their only purpose was to demoralize and try to keep some drumpf voters home on election night seems to have backfired. not only did it instill a sense of urgency in conservative voters, but it gave many dem voters a sense of complacency. my gf (literal gommie SJW neolib progressive) at the time stayed home because she thought it was a shoe in (and was also feeling "bernt-out" and didnt really dig shillary that much to begin with)