OK now that I'm home time for long form answer
>1. Genocide the rest via vaccines, illness, wars, etc
"le vaccines" lol. You know what's funny about the brainlet schizos like this. They believe that le NWO makes up dumb ways to kill those who are supposedly their loyal servants, and only those who le oppose le NWO are smart enough to not fall for it and will survive. This is dumbly dumb. Positing that le NWO exists, they would take methods that will make EXACTLY those opposing them take wrong decisions and genocide themselves. Come in vaccines. If NWO really is abusing vaccines to kill people, then it is clear: NWO is coaxing schizos into killing themselves, but how? by making them reject vaccines, of course.
>2. Eugenesic/abortions/reproduction programs
Which is absolutely based. You aren't iq89 subhuman, right?
>3. Kill all the other languages
No, it doesn't say that – it says to have a common language. A lingua franca. Aren't we talking in English right now?
>4. The same reason which current elite class doesn't even know what a woman is.
No, hysterical screeching is not tempered reason.
>5. "Fair"= If just dissobey me you don't have rights (Trudeu Canada or Coronavirus vaccine law for example.
It says the opposite of this, but OK. Consider also this in conjunction with point 7.
>6. Imagine literally giving all the power of law and justice to a single entity. Is this global dictatorship?
"Let all nations rule internally" is the opposite of having a global dictatorship. Instead, it says there should be a global-level tiered system of solving disputes. What's inside a nation, stays inside a nation. What's between nations, should have an institution that nations agree on to solve disputes.
>7. This is the only good thing.
And it puts a lot of other points in context, where you categorically insist on trying to apply a dishonest reading to other points, 7 in conjunction with 4 directly implies that dishonest readings are not allowed.
>8. Depends
See points 7 and 4.
>9. Truth and beauty? But they spread lies and ugliness in media
Who is "they"? Why are you assuming that whoever set up those stones must be le NWO, le ebil international cabal? All points seem to mostly imply the opposite. And this one should be a dead giveaway: WHOEVER SET UP THOSE STONES IS OPPOSED TO THOSE WHOM YOU IDENTIFY AS THE ENEMY TOO. You're being psyoped into thinking the Georgia Guidestones are the enemy. But you're committing friendly fire here.
>10. Modern Civilization and technology are against nature. They are the cancer.
Another point that points that Georgia Guidestones were set up by someone who is AGAINST modern civilization.
You have committed the most dumbest mistake ever: by taking the assumption that Georgia Guidestones were set up by "le NWO" (whatever that may mean) and that they're the enemy, without reading what they actually say, and then when you read what they actually say, since they say the opposite of what you imagine "le NWO" of saying, imply that they're written dishonestly. Dishonest to whom? It is only a proof that Georgia Guidestones are NOT the enemy & that you're a psyopped idiot.