Lite mode. Switch to Full
invert_colors
logout
/int/
/int/
Post a Replyarrow_backarrow_downward
TurkeyBernd2021-02-07 19:33:37 · 5yNo. 109077reply
>Posting links to other IB's and discussing them is ok but threads consisting of nothing BUT a link to some dead shithole is not. If you want to advertise your board on KC at least have the decency to make it an interesting thread, e.g. explain how that place is different in its moderation policies ("We don't allow pedos!") and what are its features ("We display posts ON A MAP!") so Bernds can have a discussion.
They are making fun of us bros
FinlandBernd2021-02-07 19:43:37 · 5yNo. 109078reply
 
Success breeds jealousy. They are a sinking ship and people like myself are permanently leaving (have already left) looking for newer and better sites.
That is their death struggle, they are lashing out while they are openly branding themselves as a site for pedophiles, and that is all they will become. Before this they were able to lure in Bernds looking for something to replace the old KC with, but the average Bernd will leave that schizo shithole in disdain, looking for intelligent discussions to be had. While that site will attract only the most vile and lowest forms of life in society.
During my 15 years of imageboard posting, there hasn't been a single time pedoshit has been needed, and its posters has always been banned. They don't realise it themselves, but becoming addicted to something as primitive as being aroused by children, is a sign of extremely low intelligence, and I don't see what such people have to offer to a site. Let them sink.
RussiaBernd2021-02-07 19:43:54 · 5yNo. 109079reply
I've stopped posting on that parasha long ago. They can stick their rules in da ass.
The moment that shithole went down for a minute, everybody will flee and few will come back.
RussiaBernd2021-02-07 19:45:08 · 5yNo. 109081reply
>OP's language must be English
Fucking English my ass, bitches!
NetherlandsBernd2021-02-07 20:02:10 · 5yNo. 109084reply
Nah, there's this one loser with a Dutch flag or TOR who always posts a link to his gutter tier imageboard. Advertising this board on KC gets your post deleted no matter how high quality it is.
TurkeyBernd2021-02-07 20:07:29 · 5yNo. 109086reply
Pathetic excuses tbh, real reason they ban bg advert threads is all bernds bailing that pedo ridden shithole after using our magnificent board.
RussiaBernd2021-02-07 20:09:13 · 5yNo. 109087reply
RussiaBernd2021-02-07 20:10:07 · 5yNo. 109088reply
By the way, they can't ban TOR. If somebody would want to spam bg there every day, that wouldn't be a broblem.
MoscowBernd2021-02-07 20:11:33 · 5yNo. 109090reply
The interface of krautchan.rip is inconvenient to use. Sorry.
TurkeyBernd2021-02-07 20:12:38 · 5yNo. 109091reply
you can only post via tor after proof-of-work.
which is still exploitable but it requires collective effort.
TurkeyBernd2021-02-07 20:15:26 · 5yNo. 109092reply
RussiaBernd2021-02-07 20:36:49 · 5yNo. 109094reply
It really is, you shouldn't be sorry. But KC has muh innovations and posting on /map/ board on the other hand.
The moment you realize what magnificent features this board has you become disappointed in uselessness and clumsiness of the UX.
NetherlandsBernd2021-02-07 20:44:05 · 5yNo. 109095reply
This board is really amazing on mobile though. Boomers don't get it.
RussiaBernd2021-02-07 21:03:06 · 5yNo. 109098reply
Serious discussions and phoneposting are in the opposite directions, child.
NetherlandsBernd2021-02-07 21:09:41 · 5yNo. 109100reply
See, it's a mentality. I don't get hung up over who uses what kind of devices, but I decide on the merits of these respective devices.
RussiaBernd2021-02-07 21:14:05 · 5yNo. 109101reply
If you're really as young as I think, then you just don't know shit about how it was before and how shitty it is now in comparison.
It's just web became so shitty exactly because of mobile devices.
TurkeyBernd2021-02-07 21:26:47 · 5yNo. 109104reply
bullshit, it was always shit before mobile era (lynxchan is the best example of it, using it feels exactly like 2010), mobile actually made it better in every aspect.
this is probably why people like >>109090 exist, i bet he still uses windows xp or some shitty outdated linux shell, because his brain cant digest progress and change in any form even if it makes life a lot easier.
Saint PetersburgBernd2021-02-07 21:30:21 · 5yNo. 109105reply
TurkeyBernd2021-02-07 21:33:09 · 5yNo. 109106reply
>what is lazy loading of off screen content
RussiaBernd2021-02-07 21:34:13 · 5yNo. 109107reply
Why lazy loading wasn't a problem before mobile era I wonder?
Also everything turns into shit on slow internet connection. Was it a problem on ADSL modems? No. Hmm.
TurkeyBernd2021-02-07 21:35:11 · 5yNo. 109108reply
it was never a problem and it still isnt.
RussiaBernd2021-02-07 21:36:23 · 5yNo. 109109reply
Kek. On slow mobile connection css goes to khui and I see css class names instead of pictures. You just haven't seen that.
NetherlandsBernd2021-02-07 21:42:41 · 5yNo. 109110reply
Maybe you shouldn't assume things about people off mere sentences, especially considering that this board only has two active Dutch posters. This board's interface isn't perfect and needs a lot of tweaking, but it's absolutely the way forward.
TurkeyBernd2021-02-07 21:44:24 · 5yNo. 109112reply
TurkeyBernd2021-02-07 21:49:54 · 5yNo. 109114reply
Not sure if it is even possible. Because everything preloaded first then rendered, on other sites when there are separate css/js files and html code it is possible (exactly because they're made with outdated tech).
On this site everything is preloaded and aggressively cached on first load, later only dynamic request for raw data are made, some of those requests are cached as well.
And to be clear i haven't spent a lot of time on optimization, it is still on roadmap and everything can be done way more efficiently, and it will be done in the future. I'm planning another rework when i have time.
RussiaBernd2021-02-07 21:55:43 · 5yNo. 109115reply
Have you assumed I assumed anything? Phh, you're pathetic.
Well, it looks like broken shit every second time. Not a big issue, we are all got used to things broken here and there nowadays.
TurkeyBernd2021-02-07 21:59:53 · 5yNo. 109116reply
What looks broken? This site?
There are lots of browser related issues because to be honest it is only fully tested on Chrome.
I have to rely on bug reports for other browsers.
RussiaBernd2021-02-07 22:01:46 · 5yNo. 109117reply
Posting on /map/ board was broken for the past month in the latest Chrome version. Your excuses worth nothing.
FinlandBernd2021-02-07 22:07:49 · 5yNo. 109123reply
>lynxchan is the best example of it, using it feels exactly like 2010
lol, how sites became better after that? should every chan be like this in your opinion? only with css it could be made to feel much more modern if wanted
layout of default lynxchan front-end is terrible imo, but it was nothing to do with this
>mobile actually made it better in every aspect
like simplified everything because space in mobile screen is very limited and lack of right right functionality? spa webpages are also futile in many cases and they tend to buggy (like here) because they are often overcomplicated and javascript don't always even work same way if different browsers, or who knows why, maybe it's some magic
 
isn't it also awesome here when for example links back to /int/ aren't even real links and you can't open this "link" to new tab, instead you have to go top, click krautchan.rip and open new tab via it and navigate to /int/
and this feature where reply box jumps on screen if it's not in it's initial position when you right click it is also totally amazing, sugooooi!
 
 
anyway in general i like this site but not how it's made, tho it's still better to adapt to new ways if new generations are wanted to get in as "old fashioned" sites might feel too ancient for them, idk.
TurkeyBernd2021-02-07 22:29:18 · 5yNo. 109136reply
Nobody was giving you any excuses.
 
>lol, how sites became better after that?
They're easier to use on all devices, they're loading faster, they work faster QOL generally is incomparably better.
Today you can open any modern tech stack web site on literally fridge or gas stove and it will work.
Back then we had just pages of text with couple of links and images here and there, now we actually have real applications with rich media and complex behavior.
 
>isn't it also awesome here when for example links back to /int/ aren't even real links and you can't open this "link" to new tab, instead you have to go top, click krautchan.rip and open new tab via it and navigate to /int/
>and this feature where reply box jumps on screen if it's not in it's initial position when you right click it is also totally amazing, sugooooi!
Those are bugs, not design choices.
If you have healthy arguments to criticize my design choices for this web site i'm more then welcome to hear them and in fact i've made a lot of changes based on feedback.
RussiaBernd2021-02-07 22:31:19 · 5yNo. 109140reply
>lots of browser related issues because to be honest it is only fully tested on Chrome
<Nobody was giving you any excuses.
RussiaBernd2021-02-07 22:36:30 · 5yNo. 109143reply
>they're loading faster, they work faster QOL
Kek. You don't have an idea how long does it take to reload page here, I mean, go from a thread/board to the home page with threads from all the boards. Sometimes it takes up to 10 seconds. Do I wait 10 seconds to reload a page on other not so progressive imageboards? No.
If it's slow connection, I don't actually really care. On other boards it isn't the issue because you always get html with all the texts first and then only images are taking some time to load, which isn't critical. Here I sit and wait and look at that ugly cube animation.
FinlandBernd2021-02-07 23:02:54 · 5yNo. 109157reply
>They're easier to use on all devices
so you say mobiles didn't make web worse but better because now web works better on mobiles? hmm
>they're loading faster
i dont see difference when loading time usually isn't anything anyway, depending on how fast server responds, if i press f5 in another (vichan based) small chan site it's usable in like 0.2s
loading site does feel snappier here (after first(slow) load), but about any practical benefits i'm not sure
 
>Those are bugs, not design choices.
well, most likely with "more traditional" design choices such bugs would never came up'd to begin with
>spa webpages are also futile in many cases and they tend to buggy (like here) because they are often overcomplicated and javascript don't always even work same way if different browsers, or who knows why, maybe it's some magic
TurkeyBernd2021-02-07 23:09:59 · 5yNo. 109160reply
> On other boards it isn't the issue because you always get html with all the texts first and then only images are taking some time to load, which isn't critical
What you wrote doesnt make any sense, this website transfers PLAIN DATA stripped of HTML which is less traffic and will always load faster then same data mixed with html. Also video related.
 
>loading site does feel snappier here (after first(slow) load), but about any practical benefits i'm not sure
Its not optimized here so loading speed is more or less the same.
But in future you will see there will be no loading time at all which is only possible due to modern web capabilities.
>well, most likely with "more traditional" design choices such bugs would never came up'd to begin with
Concrete logic indeed, but those traditional design choices had to be developed first and guess what they weren't in their final form right from the beginning.
>spa webpages are also futile in many cases and they tend to buggy (like here) because they are often overcomplicated and javascript don't always even work same way if different browsers, or who knows why, maybe it's some magic
That's not the case if done properly. (Look at youtube or twitter or other AAA spa application)
RussiaBernd2021-02-07 23:14:35 · 5yNo. 109161reply
>What you wrote doesnt make any sense, this website transfers PLAIN DATA stripped of HTML which is less traffic and will always load faster then same data mixed with html.
It is true, however you don't take into account what connections to the server are delayed. In case of old style sites I get all the texts the moment I connect to the server, I can start reading in two seconds or less. For KC I get nothing useful on the first connection, and the following connections sometimes get delayed. I don't know why. So I'm waiting for the texts to be delivered in the end longer than on old style sites.
Theoretically you are correct, but in practice you're wrong.
TurkeyBernd2021-02-07 23:24:35 · 5yNo. 109167reply
Because its bugged. if you switch board message buffer gets pratially trashed and you have to wait for data to be transfered again.
It is to be rewritten.
It is planned to cache all loaded messages on client side and only transfer deltas in the future which is proper modern web behavior.
 
Also notice that what we talking about here is not kc.rip but modern web in general.
RussiaBernd2021-02-07 23:24:56 · 5yNo. 109168reply
>Look at youtube or twitter or other AAA spa application
These guys utilize spdy protocol to run their server. The speed up is achieved because instead of creating several connections to the server to load resources separately they can utilize one or two, with bidirectional communication. That's why you don't have problems loading resources from their sites — connections simply don't get delayed. SPA doesn't have to do anything about that.
RussiaBernd2021-02-07 23:26:27 · 5yNo. 109169sagereply
>Also notice that what we talking about here is not kc.rip but modern web in general.
Sounds pretty much like what we were discussing all that time for me. I'm not attacking KC.rip in particular.
You have done good job here, nevertheless.
TurkeyBernd2021-02-07 23:30:30 · 5yNo. 109170reply
They use http2/3 with rest just like the rest of web, spdy got trashed years ago due to http2 doing everything spdy wanted but better, there is nothing special about it, we all use it today.
RussiaBernd2021-02-08 07:11:12 · 5yNo. 109175reply
>we all use it today
I don' believe it. Show proofs.
MoscowBernd2021-02-08 07:52:40 · 5yNo. 109179reply
/int/Post a Replyarrow_backarrow_upward